S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Transcript of 2004 S2000 "short take" (from Motorweek 2/28/04)

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #11  
Intrepid175's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Texas City
Default

Originally posted by Destiny2002
I thought we already agreed that comparing 0-60 times isn't worthwhile since the 2004 has to shift to third before reaching 60?
Yeah but haven't the 2004's been at least equaling their predecessors in 0-60 times in spite of that extra shift?

I seem to remember reading that somewhere but could be wrong.

Drive Safe,
Steve R.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #12  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by dlq04
When ever you see the comment about more elbow room, you can be sure that all the writer did was copy the press release and fluff it up with some of his own stuff.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 05:00 PM
  #13  
SgtSaunders's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, USA
Default

Yup I saw that episode too. Don't want to sound like broken record but during accel test, the launch was weak. They had a mic on-site and you could hear the driver barely above idle while letting clutch out. I don't abuse my clutch but...... gimmie a break.

C&D had the 5.3 sec 0-60 for MY03. They (I think it was Csaba himself) stated that some practice is needed to get the S a decent 1/4mi & 0-60 time. I can't agree more. But as we can all agree to, our S was not designed to be a drag strip terror.

It was interesting to see the 04 in action though. Am seriously contemplating a trade-in from 02 to 04 or 05.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 05:51 PM
  #14  
Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 0
From: Tiffin, Ohio
Default

The 0-100km/h test is becomming more ludacris every day. A car manufacturer should design a transmission best for the engine, and not for the reporter driving it.

That's why the STI in tests is slower in the 0-60 run than the Evo, but pulls a faster 1400 meter. Each one is geared best for it's setup, but can hurt one in certain situations.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 03:00 PM
  #15  
DWynne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Destiny2002
[I]In fact, chassis balance is just about perfect, and body roll almost nonexistent. This is one sweet handling car! So sweet that it turned in quicker lap times than both a Mazda RX-8 and Nissan 350Z that we were testing at the track at the same time.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tokyo_james
S2000 Talk
23
Jun 26, 2004 01:47 PM
Liosandro
S2000 Talk
7
May 24, 2004 10:03 AM
wavelet
Car and Bike Talk
55
May 5, 2004 11:56 AM
germ79
S2000 Talk
23
Aug 15, 2003 08:19 PM
zeraful
S2000 Talk
6
Jan 3, 2003 07:31 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 AM.