S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

what's was the point for honda?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #21  
wildcardtrd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 1
From: UCF Knights!
Default

Originally Posted by replica,Jul 6 2006, 12:38 PM
You raise a valid question, but at least in my case, it helped them increase their marketshare. This is the first Honda car I've ever owned. I've had 2 CBR's, but never a car or truck. I'm a huge Toyota fan, and I hate FWD (have never purchased anything FWD). But now look at who makes what.

So going back to your question, Honda has done exactly what Toyota is not doing. They are making a product for company pride and for us enthusiasts, probably at the expense of sheer profits. And that is why they now have my business.
I also came over from the Toyota crowd. There's nothing like winding this car out to full song, braking hard while cresting over a hill, downshifting, then winding out VTEC while cornering
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #22  
ghoonk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Default

That's what makes us interesting folks. It's obvious that we aren't into GT cruisers, straight line, high torque muscle cars. We're a community that enjoys the pleasure of driving, people who love the scream of a high-revving engine, wind in our hair, and the joy of rowing gears.

Yes, we're a bunch of automotive hedonists who love the pleasure of driving more than sheer, mindless power.

Honda didn't make the S2000 for people like us. We were born for this car
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #23  
K-Lo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,175
Likes: 0
From: SIN CITY - Las Vegas
Default

[QUOTE=Hockey,Jul 6 2006, 04:58 AM] You DO come up with some of the most random posts.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:20 AM
  #24  
TRDLiquidSilver's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 19
From: NYC to SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by wildcardtrd,Jul 6 2006, 09:59 AM
I also came over from the Toyota crowd. There's nothing like winding this car out to full song, braking hard while cresting over a hill, downshifting, then winding out VTEC while cornering
same here! owned two toyotas and when it came to a high revving motor toyota had one available in 2000, the 2ZZ. so, for me the first couple of weeks i felt like a traitor but unfortunately toyota doesn't have a high revving rwd sports car. when they come out with the supra replacement in a year based on the IS350 i still would choose the S. unless of course they find a way for the 2GR to rev to 8k then maybe.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:24 AM
  #25  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Originally Posted by fonzy_S2K,Jul 6 2006, 01:09 PM
where can I get this book? yeah that sums up most of it.
Amazon lists a few.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/076030906...2080003?ie=UTF8
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #26  
Alexis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=dyhppy,Jul 6 2006, 03:34 AM]first of all, im not complaining in the least.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #27  
dyhppy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 1
From: Santa Monica-SoCal
Default

who said im mad at honda. i simply said it didn't make financial sense and i wouldn't have done it, especially for a world that mostly wouldn't appreciate it. lots to say for another one of my stupid threads.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #28  
C U AT 9K's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 17,163
Likes: 4
Default

why doesnt S2ki write a book about the S??
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #29  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by C U AT 9K,Jul 6 2006, 02:54 PM
why doesnt S2ki write a book about the S??
We're all too busy driving.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #30  
gomarlins3's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 23,390
Likes: 105
From: Kuna Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by Hockey,Jul 6 2006, 06:58 AM
You DO come up with some of the most random posts.

However you gave me cause to dig out my "Honda S2000" book by Daniel F. Carney so I could find an official quote for you.......

"The development goal of the S2000 was to create a sportscar that embodies Honda's challenging spirit.........We wanted to design a car that gives sheer driving pleasure. The design goals were to create a car with state-of-the-art technology, innovation and sporty handling, and to create a car that brings the pleasure of driving to a wider audience of sportscar enthusiasts."

That just about sums it up, but I will add a few points.

1. The car was developed as a 50th anniversary celebration of Honda.

2. The S500 was Honda's first car, so how fitting that an updated version be re-introduced for the anniversary.

3. Honda wanted to bring their F1 technology to the street (highest hp/liter.....F1 inspired tach.... push-button start.....bare-bones interior for the more serious driver.

4. Classic roadster touches meaning, long nose/short rear deck, rear wheel drive (for Honda??? - yup), 6-speed which I think was Honda's first, balanced weight distribution for optimal handling.

5. There was a growing market with the popularity of the Miata, Z3, Boxster, and SLK...that Honda saw good sales potential.

I could go on. Think I like this car?!?!?

-Hockey
Great post and sums it all up very well.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:58 AM.