S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

what's was the point for honda?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #41  
C U AT 9K's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 17,163
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Jul 6 2006, 07:10 PM
Is that author associated with S2ki?
No, I don't know why they said S2KI is...


I mean like, there has got to be a bunch of guys willing to put something like that, and it could be sent out to those who are paying members of this site, with tips and info on TSB's, popular parts, tuning tips, etc. etc.

Oh wait isn't that what those Hyper Rev things are.

****!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 09:31 PM
  #42  
gotswap's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Originally Posted by TRDLiquidSilver,Jul 6 2006, 09:04 AM
even at work people wonder why i got rid of the IS when they rode in my S.
That is hilarious. All my friends think I am crazy for getting rid of my IS for the s2k. They just don't understand!!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 09:38 PM
  #43  
ghoonk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Jul 6 2006, 12:08 PM
We're all too busy driving.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 01:49 AM
  #44  
mister x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 6
From: Honolulu
Default

The S2000 creates a "halo" effect for Honda, all the way down to their lawn mowers.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 07:46 AM
  #45  
Alexis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chicken8,Jul 6 2006, 05:18 PM
the S and the NSX are the flagship models for honda. every company has a flagship model and the reason is it helps the sales of the cars in the lower range. because people think. gee honda is a company that makes such nice cars, i'd like a car made by honda but can't afford the flagships or its not suitable to me. so i'll get a accord or a civic.

every good car company has flagship models. the ones who don't are usually the ones that people reckon are "crap" car manufacturers, like daewoo, daihatsu etc.
I think you may be confusing flagship w/ a "halo" car (as Mister X wrote). A flagship is the top of the line model, the one that's got all the bells and whistles. For example, the S Class is Mercedes' flagship. The S2000 is not Honda's top of the line model, neither has it got all the bells and whistles (not even tilt steering). Not that I'm advocating tilt steering for the S2000, but a flagship car has got to have all the gizmos.

That said, I agree that the S2000 and the NSX are "halo" cars.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 07:49 AM
  #46  
Ks320's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
Default

I'm just glad that Honda made this car -- that's all.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #47  
The_Chinadian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: NOVA - near Ballston
Default

Originally Posted by dyhppy,Jul 6 2006, 07:34 AM
first of all, im not complaining in the least. i am an owner and LOVE every minute of it. but all those warm and fuzzy sentiments about honda doing it for the love and the pleasure of the enthusiast sounds naive. honda does f1 stuff because of advertising, not to mention that have many sponsors.
Publicly traded companies are more concerned about the bottom line than privately held companies. Honda, I believe, is privately held. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. If that's true, then Honda doesn't have shareholders and a bottom line to answer to every quarter.

While I agree from a business case, it doesn't make sense; it's very possible that a privately held company will eat the cost to deliver a product they're passionate about.

There also is a business case for it in that every car company likes to have a car to draw customers into the dealership. Of course, Honda doesn't really need this, but the S2000 may help in that regard.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #48  
Ks320's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
Default

[QUOTE=The_Chinadian,Jul 7 2006, 02:18 PM] Publicly traded companies are more concerned about the bottom line than privately held companies.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #49  
redhead2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

I'll accept the possibility that Honda as a corporation is not making money on the S2000, or at least has not made back all of its original development costs.

But if so, all I can say is "thank you!" to those nice people who buy Civics, Accords, Preludes, Odysseys, Pilots, CRV's, RL/TL's, RSX/TSX/RDX/MDX's, etc., so that the engineers can indulge their dreams by building the S2000--for us.

Thanks, Honda.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 11:07 AM
  #50  
Ks320's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
Default

Some quotes from an article in Bloomberg magazine about Honda:

"The idea of putting styling and marketing on an equal footing with engineering hasn't quite gotten through at Honda." John Wormald, Autopolis.

"Honda has a sustainable competitive advantage because its engineers are excited and interested in what they do." Norihito Kanai, Meiji Dresdner Asset Management.

"Honda and Toyota need each other, even as they're grinding competitors into the dust. Without Honda, Toyota would be too conservative, and without Toyota, Honda would be too crazy." James Womack, Lean Enterprise Institute.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM.