I don't miss the torque mostly because I love revving it high anyway just to listen


Maybe only 1 or 2 times during the 8 years I've owned this car have I thought, "Damn, no torque".

 

^ my gf has a bmw 135i and it has gobs of torque down low (compared to the s2000) and i drive her car often. perhaps that's why i feel the difference. i like the s2000 better though.

 

My wife has a Subaru Outback so I don't have that problem.

 

HP/L

 

I wonder how many liters of horsepower I could buy with $1,100,000 worth of S2000s

Even figuring what I paid for my car when it was new, that's 80.6 liters and a total of 9680 horsepower.

The Veyron might be nice, but I'll take the 36 S2000s and change instead

Oh yeah, to make a slightly more apples to apples comparison, I have a friend that bought a supercharged AP1 for $17K, tuned it and dynoed it earlier this year and made 385 horsepower. That's 192.5 HP/L. Significantly more than 125. And 64.7 of those would be a total of 12,455 horsepower for your $1.1M

 

^ yes, but you would stil only have 200whp(maybe) in each of those 36 s2k's compared to 1001hp, im not saying id take a bugati over 36 different cars, just sayin.

 

Honda S2000 2.2 ltr engine NA 247 crank HP!!!

BMW 1 series 3.0ltr engine...300HP but with larger
engine and 2 turbos!

BMW M3..the great E46...3.2ltr NA 333HP...still trails
the S! M POWER?? ha!

VW GTI..2.0ltr turbo "Engine of the year" blah blah blah
even turboed its 210HP!
Of course it's detuned....but like mentioned before the
S can put out 400 crank HP with low boost turbo!!
It's just a tiny..tiny..tiny...POWERHOUSE!

 

i remember seeing a ducati motor cycle having a 999cc making 197bhp and 87 torque.

 

I just wanna have sex on top of a bugatti veyron hood, I could care less about owning one. This machine will burn a hole in my small wallet, I would rather enjoy being in full orgasim ecstasy, then having to pay for tires just to take it for a 15min joyride.

 

Can't be good for the metal