S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

FEELS 2.3L kit for s2000!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 09:05 PM
  #11  
mingster's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 10,134
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Default

Before you get too excited, a stroker kit like that will most likely reduce the redline, just like Spoon's stroker kit (2.2L) that reduces redline to 8400RPMs - any higher than that you'll risk seeing your pistons make 4 nice holes on your aluminum hood.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 09:09 PM
  #12  
bayarea408's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,594
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally posted by mingster
Before you get too excited, a stroker kit like that will most likely reduce the redline, just like Spoon's stroker kit (2.2L) that reduces redline to 8400RPMs - any higher than that you'll risk seeing your pistons make 4 nice holes on your aluminum hood.
but in order to make the litre go up to 2.2 or 2.3 you have to make the sleeves for the pistons bigger, wont that make the walls thinner and crack the walls during heavy driving conditions?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 09:34 PM
  #13  
JoeD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Default

maybe its just me...but i would never do a mod that lowered the redline.

the 9K redline is one of the many things i love about this car, and i would not want anything to change that!
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 09:35 PM
  #14  
JoeD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by realthing
[B]how well known is this company?
I see the parts on people's cars all the time - (never any on engines), but are they particularly famous for their racing success?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 09:43 PM
  #15  
JoeD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by liquid215
What kind of gains should we expect with a kit like this?
strictly from a mathematical standpiont, if the engine still redlined at 9000, it would make 276 hp and 176 lb. ft. of torque ot the engine. but i stress those numbers are strictly from calculating hp/tq per liter.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 09:54 PM
  #16  
infinitebass's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

You don't actually have to bore out the cylinder. You change the length of the rods and diameter of the crank to change the stroke.

I think if the components were say....titanium, you wouldn't have to worry about decreasing the redline.

Blake
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 09:59 PM
  #17  
S2K2GO!!!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Sebastopol
Default

Originally posted by bayarea408


but in order to make the litre go up to 2.2 or 2.3 you have to make the sleeves for the pistons bigger, wont that make the walls thinner and crack the walls during heavy driving conditions?
It would appear that the increase in displacement comes entirely from increased stroke- no change in the barrels. Resulting increase in piston velocity would certainly reduce redline, so there may not be much HP gain. Mechanical advantage of the crank would increase, so torque could improve significantly. I would not count on optimal induction air or exhaust tuning with this mod, however, so it would be a good idea to see some valid dyno results before diving in. I'll look into gettiong the Japanese translated by a friend of mine who will be visiting.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 10:01 PM
  #18  
bayarea408's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,594
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally posted by S2K2GO!!!


It would appear that the increase in displacement comes entirely from increased stroke- no change in the barrels. Resulting increase in piston velocity would certainly reduce redline, so there may not be much HP gain. Mechanical advantage of the crank would increase, so torque could improve significantly. I would not count on optimal induction air or exhaust tuning with this mod, however, so it would be a good idea to see some valid dyno results before diving in. I'll look into gettiong the Japanese translated by a friend of mine who will be visiting.
i always though the best way to get more litre was to bore out the piston sleeves to make it bigger to fit the bigger pistons. i guess i was wrong.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2002 | 10:56 PM
  #19  
infinitebass's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

I believe the S2000 cylinder walls are really thin in relation to each other, so there is not much room to bore them out. Usually when you go for a large increase in size, you do a little of both boring and stroking.

Blake
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2002 | 12:59 AM
  #20  
Steve@Evolution's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Eastcoast
Default

Stroker kit increase rod length but also raise the static compression.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM.