J's racing f22C
You can't include the price of the AEM EMS in the discussion because the J's engine doesn't include an ECU either. And believe me, you won't be making 300 hp on the stock ECU. Both cars will still need intake, header, exhaust, intake manifold, etc.
So you're looking at a $2500 savings and you could probably get the thing warranteed by Honda if anything happened
With respect to Terd's question:
David's car put down 257.5 whp on my Dynapack. The average 350Z puts down 254 whp. The best Acura TL (stock) I ever dyno'd put down 242 whp. The average is around 238 whp. A stock 2.0 liter S2000, depending upon year, averaged 212-217 whp. Stock 2.2's are averaging 238 whp. Joe Alaniz's 2.0 race motor he built for us last year made 262 whp. If we could port the intake manifold and use a bigger throttle body David's car would make at least 8-10 hp more. I've got some dyno charts I can email to someone if they want to post them.
UL
So you're looking at a $2500 savings and you could probably get the thing warranteed by Honda if anything happened

With respect to Terd's question:
David's car put down 257.5 whp on my Dynapack. The average 350Z puts down 254 whp. The best Acura TL (stock) I ever dyno'd put down 242 whp. The average is around 238 whp. A stock 2.0 liter S2000, depending upon year, averaged 212-217 whp. Stock 2.2's are averaging 238 whp. Joe Alaniz's 2.0 race motor he built for us last year made 262 whp. If we could port the intake manifold and use a bigger throttle body David's car would make at least 8-10 hp more. I've got some dyno charts I can email to someone if they want to post them.
UL
Originally Posted by kane.s2k' date='Feb 16 2005, 07:38 PM
Terd, I think there's a large gap in your understanding of power outputs that various dyno's give out. Not all dyno's are the same. Comparing the power shown on one dyno on one day cant be compared to a totally different dyno on another day. They just put out different numbers even on the same motors. Plain simple fact.
The motor UL was talking about would actually make around the same power as the J's and i'm sure without the 100 octane to boot.
The motor UL was talking about would actually make around the same power as the J's and i'm sure without the 100 octane to boot.
With that being said, different dyno brands and different cars can be compared to some extent. A Dynojet reads 10 to 15% higher than a Mustang dyno. A Dynapack reads even higher than that. With these factors taken into consideration, you can compare dyno results to a limited extent. Which is what we are doing.
Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD' date='Feb 16 2005, 07:21 PM
As for the header/exhaust combo. I forget the specific name of the company that made it. There was only one that was made and I believe that it was 5K to build, it sold used here a couple of months back for 2-3K. Made by one of the most reputable race builders around, I'm sure someone else will remember the name. If not I'll look and see if I can find it. Not cheap at all but it was one of the best. The reason that only one was made was because they couldn't get enough interest from people to build more too $$$$.
Originally Posted by terd ferguson' date='Feb 18 2005, 06:11 AM
But, there are no alternatives domestically to an in stock off the shelf S 2000 crate motor such as J's, Spoon, Feel's, etc.
I only included the AEM in the figures because it was used to gain the claimed horsepower. Who knows what power either engine would make on a stock ECU (if it would run)?
My point was that people just can't make the "Oh well the J's puts out 300ps because it is *probably* using their computer / bolt ons" argument when the US competition is using a fully programmable EMS to get their ~300 hp.
My point is that most of the argument is conjecture on both sides and as much as I'd like to see a shoot out on an engine dyno under controlled conditions (and similar bolt on set ups) between the US guys and the likes of J's, Amuse, and Toda. Its not going to happen.
Call it blind faith or stupidity, I don't much care. But if we were to bring all these big boys together and have such a contest all playing under the same rules I'd put my money on J's, Amuse, or Toda.
But until we do set up such a contest, I think the internet arguments comparing apples and oranges and assuming this and that are pointless
With that said I have a great deal of respect for the US guys and the work they're doing. When I choose my products I choose the highest quality I can get at the best price. In carbon fiber hoods for example, the win clearly goes to Japan. In the engine building department, well the jury is still out for me
My point was that people just can't make the "Oh well the J's puts out 300ps because it is *probably* using their computer / bolt ons" argument when the US competition is using a fully programmable EMS to get their ~300 hp.

My point is that most of the argument is conjecture on both sides and as much as I'd like to see a shoot out on an engine dyno under controlled conditions (and similar bolt on set ups) between the US guys and the likes of J's, Amuse, and Toda. Its not going to happen.
Call it blind faith or stupidity, I don't much care. But if we were to bring all these big boys together and have such a contest all playing under the same rules I'd put my money on J's, Amuse, or Toda.
But until we do set up such a contest, I think the internet arguments comparing apples and oranges and assuming this and that are pointless
With that said I have a great deal of respect for the US guys and the work they're doing. When I choose my products I choose the highest quality I can get at the best price. In carbon fiber hoods for example, the win clearly goes to Japan. In the engine building department, well the jury is still out for me
Originally Posted by 1AP12NV' date='Feb 18 2005, 06:52 AM
I only included the AEM in the figures because it was used to gain the claimed horsepower.
Me thinks you just put it in to make the costs closer to support your argument.
No one knows some hidden secret and has some advantage over someone else. If you buy the J's motor it will probably be very good and produce good power within the limits of a 2 or 2.2L motor. And you can just order and pay for it, and a few months later a crate motor will be delivered with a blue rocker cover.
My only argument is, with a small amount of effort on your part (sourcing an engine new or used in good nick and delivering to a local reputable builder) you can have exactly the same for a lot less money and support a local industry. And get any colour valve cover you like.
There really seems to be a theme int he JDM tuning world that car modification is 'part with a wad of money, bolt on 50 hp and a brand name'. Maybe I'm old school, but to me tuning is about research, knowledge, hands-on work and minimal dollars spent.
At the end of the day we both end up with more hp (hopefully), but I also get more knowledge and experience and satisfaction out of being an integral part of the process. YMMV
According to J's site, you get valve and port grinding too. You also get their valve cover, oil cap, oil filter lock (which is very trick), and oil pan. Thier price on their site for the 2 liter is 498000 yen with exchange.
This is still a good deal for a hand assembled and balanced motor, I don't care what anyone says.
http://www.jsracing.co.jp/
Go to S 2000, then on the pull down menu, select engine parts to see more details.
Oh yeah, make it easy on yourself and select english. The translations alone are worth the visit.
This is still a good deal for a hand assembled and balanced motor, I don't care what anyone says.
http://www.jsracing.co.jp/
Go to S 2000, then on the pull down menu, select engine parts to see more details.
Oh yeah, make it easy on yourself and select english. The translations alone are worth the visit.




