S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Post your Alignment

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 11:42 AM
  #31  
spider's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, Cali49A
Default

With rear camber at -2.5
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 12:09 PM
  #32  
Prolene's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by spider
[B]With rear camber at -2.5
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 03:27 PM
  #33  
Luis's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Lisbon
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Prolene
[B]
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 04:10 PM
  #34  
Prolene's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Luis, what is "scuttle"?

I went with that amount of camber at the suggestion of the person aligning. Not a very informed decision, I admit, but this was from someone with alot of experience in setting up alignments. At this time, I don't feel a need to cure power exit oversteer, as it is more a steering feel than the rear stepping out, as it did constantly at some corners of Laguna Seca, Buttonwillow, and around the neighborhood canyon twisties.

Good comment on tire performance; same goes with braking and turning simultaneously, I know.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 03:29 AM
  #35  
Luis's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Lisbon
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Prolene
[B]Luis,
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2002 | 05:09 AM
  #36  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,798
Likes: 8,299
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

I find the Honda UK settings very interesting. They follow the trend of you hot shoes by adding more negative camber front and rear but their front castor setting goes up. This raises a few questions.

Would there be anything different in the UK suspension?

Do you think their settings are based purely on driver expections or something else?

Any thoughts on why their castor setting is heading a different direction?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2002 | 10:30 AM
  #37  
Luis's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Lisbon
Default

I believe Honda UK rented a track and beat the hell out of the car before they came up with those numbers.

The increase in caster is aiming to help with the steering numbness that lots of car magazines in the UK are complaining about.

I wonder if these alignment figures are achievable in all cars especially on lowered cars.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2002 | 10:53 AM
  #38  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,798
Likes: 8,299
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luis
[B]I believe Honda UK rented a track and beat the hell out of the car before they came up with those numbers.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2002 | 11:13 AM
  #39  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

Originally posted by Luis
I wonder if these alignment figures are achievable in all cars especially on lowered cars.
My car is lowered 1.1 inches F, 1.2 R and I use essentially the same alignment as the UK recommendation.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2002 | 11:33 AM
  #40  
pll's Avatar
pll
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally posted by Prolene
At this time, I don't feel a need to cure power exit oversteer, as it is more a steering feel than the rear stepping out, as it did constantly at some corners of Laguna Seca, Buttonwillow, and around the neighborhood canyon twisties.
Just out of curiosity, at which LS corners was your rear end stepping out. I can think of three corners - turn 2 (sweeper), turn 3 (off camber) and turn 11 (flat hairpin) - on which you might have had a problem. Were you accelerating before your wheels were starting to straighten?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:36 AM.