S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Question on Front Damper/Spring Removal.

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 05:21 PM
  #41  
jschmidt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

I can well imagine how this will go over in this crowd but you can generally seperate a tapered ball joint from the rod end with a couple of moderate whacks with a brass hammer on the rod end. This is the ring that the tapered part fits inside of. Whack it on the side once or twice and the knuckle will usually drop out.
Of course, whacking on the taper end is a formula for disaster (as is the pickle fork.)

There is absolutely no damage with this method.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 05:22 PM
  #42  
vapors2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: Laguna
Default

by just getting the wheels with suspension stock, understeer was lost and oversteer was very prominant when running the spoon wheels. That was the major difference I noticed.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 06:10 PM
  #43  
RT's Avatar
RT
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,269
Likes: 42
From: Redmond, WA
Default

Originally posted by jschmidt
I can well imagine how this will go over in this crowd but you can generally seperate a tapered ball joint from the rod end with a couple of moderate whacks with a brass hammer on the rod end. This is the ring that the tapered part fits inside of. Whack it on the side once or twice and the knuckle will usually drop out.
Of course, whacking on the taper end is a formula for disaster (as is the pickle fork.)

There is absolutely no damage with this method.
Yes, this old junkyard trick works great (Pitman Arms and sh!t)!
Can't remember which, but either the front or rear doesn't lend itself to this method because of a lack of real estate in which to whack.
I hear ya on the potential freak-out factor for even bring this method up
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 06:17 PM
  #44  
Prolene's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally posted by vapors2k
by just getting the wheels with suspension stock, understeer was lost and oversteer was very prominant when running the spoon wheels. That was the major difference I noticed.
After an alignment set to 'agressive street driving', there was very prominent oversteer with Spoon wheels, especially on power application at corner exits. I tried many tire presure changes to try to compensate. The Showa units seem to be correcting the oversteer to a great degree. This may be due to rear drop more than the front and other factors, I am sure. Now, I feel not much needs to be done as far as alignment goes, whereas before the Showas, I was planning to get an alignment to correct the oversteer.

Small bumps seem to be smoothed over quite a bit with the Mugens compared to the stock shocks; the latter felt stiff on small bumps, but floated on the undulating ones.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2002 | 05:02 AM
  #45  
Luis's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Lisbon
Default

Originally posted by Prolene
After an alignment set to 'agressive street driving', there was very prominent oversteer with Spoon wheels, especially on power application at corner exits. ...
may be you were runing too much rear camber. It can have that effect. I would expect steering feeling to be substantially changed. Not sure if for the better, but scrub radius is very important when it comes to feel what's happening with the front wheels.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Prolene
[B] The Showa units seem to be correcting the oversteer to a great degree. This may be due to rear drop more than the front and other factors, I am sure.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2002 | 06:53 AM
  #46  
Prolene's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Luis, All good questions. I plan to get the car corner weighted this Thursday, along with alignment. I have not had the time since Saturday when I put the Mugens on to get an alignment.

The rear camber was about 1.4 deg neg, front caster 5 pos.

Believe it or not, I decided to try the shocks (for shock effect ) initially at full stiff front and back. The back would not take a set very well around corners and would skitter or jump around. I backed off the rear by 1 1/2 turn and handling was much improved, with a slight heavier steering feel (i.e. understeer feeling) and the oversteer possibly controlled.

Hope you find and hope that I have found the "perfect" shock. Obviously, I will try to make do with these, but so far so good, and I am sure compromises are to follow.

I'll try to post how the alignment goes, whether I can get to any decided upon specs. I am telling the tech to set up for track use. I noticed that with the track days, 1000 mi of highway driving to and from tracks (Laguna Seca, Buttonwillow) the rear tires looked very evenly worn except for less tread depth on the outside halves.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2002 | 07:21 AM
  #47  
The Reverend's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
Default

Originally posted by jschmidt
I can well imagine how this will go over in this crowd but you can generally seperate a tapered ball joint from the rod end with a couple of moderate whacks with a brass hammer on the rod end. This is the ring that the tapered part fits inside of. Whack it on the side once or twice and the knuckle will usually drop out.
Of course, whacking on the taper end is a formula for disaster (as is the pickle fork.)

There is absolutely no damage with this method.
In the past, I've tried whacking ball joints from just about every angle to separate them. If the ball joint has been together for a while, it'll be too seized for whacking it to do any good other than to dent and mess sh!t up. If you're talking about whacking the treaded part of the ball joint (where the castle nut goes), that's a bad idea for another reason - you'll make it collapse where it's drilled for the cotter pin. Then you're really screwed.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2002 | 11:15 AM
  #48  
RT's Avatar
RT
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,269
Likes: 42
From: Redmond, WA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Reverend
[B]

In the past, I've tried whacking ball joints from just about every angle to separate them.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2002 | 05:22 AM
  #49  
Prolene's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally posted by Luis
I drive frequently at above 200km/h and the shocks were unbearable and even dangerous, I thought, on anything but billiard smooth surfaces.
I havn't driven that fast on this new setup yet. Would lighter wheels and brake components be an asset or hindrance to ride quality? One might have 10+ lbs less unsprung weight per wheel with the Spoon wheels and lighter weight brake components.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boyguan
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
9
Jan 23, 2014 12:56 PM
Owen_1987
S2000 Under The Hood
6
Jun 9, 2012 05:56 AM
jimreaper
S2000 Under The Hood
2
Feb 11, 2008 11:16 AM
donger274
S2000 Under The Hood
13
Feb 13, 2007 01:30 PM
GoFaassttt
S2000 Under The Hood
2
Apr 17, 2006 06:41 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:30 AM.