S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Something else we did wrong!

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:09 AM
  #1  
Lainey's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65,392
Likes: 4,681
From: Smalltown
Default Something else we did wrong!

Every day, studies show we screwed up as parents. We did it all wrong. Now, it appears, that the strollers we put our children in, should have had the child facing us, for proper interaction, and less stress for baby.

Parents who choose a stroller that seats their baby facing away from them could risk long-term development problems in their children, according to a study published Friday.
Parents are less likely to interact with children in forward-facing strollers.

The research found that children not facing the person pushing them were significantly less likely to talk, laugh and interact with their parents.


Walking with baby

OK, I see where they are coming from, but I think parents have enough to worry about, give them a break.

I have an older carriage/stroller that I still use for my grandson. He loves going for "walks". The handle goes from either side, which I use, more so to keep him out of the sun as much as possible. When he is facing away from me, he is very aware of his surroundings, trucks, cars, trees, he sees it all and comments. Somehow, I think he'll be OK, even with the time he spends facing in the opposite direction of the person walking him.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:13 AM
  #2  
zzziippyyy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 78,840
Likes: 7
From: On yo puter screen
Default

I find these studies hilarious, whats next we should drive our cars with the passenger facing us. Some researchers truly have to much time and money on there hands.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:23 AM
  #3  
Kyras's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,920
Likes: 5,421
From: Loveland, CO
Default

Then they'll learn that kids who don't look forward cannot cut the umbilical cord and face life on their own, without getting momma's approval. And they'll have lower I.Q.s (if they even allow that anymore) because they didn't get enough stimulation when they were in their strollers. Heck, seems to me most kids are sound asleep in them anyway. That's why parents like them. The kids are too heavy to carry all the time.

Another study that's an amazing waste of money.


How about how babies should sleep, to avoid SIDS? When I had my kids in 1987 and 1988, the word was NEVER FACE DOWN. I do believe the word now is NEVER FACE UP.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:26 AM
  #4  
Lainey's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65,392
Likes: 4,681
From: Smalltown
Default

Originally Posted by Kyras,Nov 21 2008, 09:23 AM
Then they'll learn that kids who don't look forward cannot cut the umbilical cord and face life on their own, without getting momma's approval. And they'll have lower I.Q.s (if they even allow that anymore) because they didn't get enough stimulation when they were in their strollers. Heck, seems to me most kids are sound asleep in them anyway. That's why parents like them. The kids are too heavy to carry all the time.

Another study that's an amazing waste of money.


How about how babies should sleep, to avoid SIDS? When I had my kids in 1987 and 1988, the word was NEVER FACE DOWN. I do believe the word now is NEVER FACE UP.
Yep! Knowing what they have learned about SIDS, that does seem to make sense. They send the parents home with literature on "Back to sleep," however, I do recall our concern was that the baby would spit up and choke if he/she was on their back.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:30 AM
  #5  
Kyras's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,920
Likes: 5,421
From: Loveland, CO
Default

^Yes, I remember hearing that about choking.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:42 AM
  #6  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,835
Likes: 8,340
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

Seems to me they focus on the sexual parts enought after they grow up.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:43 AM
  #7  
valentine's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 22,620
Likes: 867
From: The (S)Low Country
Default

Originally Posted by Kyras,Nov 21 2008, 09:23 AM
Then they'll learn that kids who don't look forward cannot cut the umbilical cord and face life on their own, without getting momma's approval. And they'll have lower I.Q.s (if they even allow that anymore) because they didn't get enough stimulation when they were in their strollers. Heck, seems to me most kids are sound asleep in them anyway. That's why parents like them. The kids are too heavy to carry all the time.

Another study that's an amazing waste of money.


How about how babies should sleep, to avoid SIDS? When I had my kids in 1987 and 1988, the word was NEVER FACE DOWN. I do believe the word now is NEVER FACE UP.
Very good points, Patty.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:49 AM
  #8  
boltonblue's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 37,536
Likes: 6,352
From: bolton
Default

That's why they need to update with technology as the answer.

So in response to this dire need I proudly introduce :
[SIZE=7][COLOR=green] The Rotisserie Series
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 05:55 AM
  #9  
Lainey's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65,392
Likes: 4,681
From: Smalltown
Default

Jerry, novel idea!

How's the leg?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 06:18 AM
  #10  
zzziippyyy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 78,840
Likes: 7
From: On yo puter screen
Default

[QUOTE=boltonblue,Nov 21 2008, 10:49 AM] That's why they need to update with technology as the answer.

So in response to this dire need I proudly introduce :
[SIZE=7][COLOR=green] The Rotisserie Series
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 AM.