United States Grand Prix
#1
Thread Starter
United States Grand Prix
I'm completely stunned that Michelin could not produce a tire to withstand 6 degrees of banking at Indianapolis. As a result, the Michelin teams boycotted the race leaving a pitiful six cars to compete. I suspect this spells the end of Formula 1 racing in the United States. I'm also sure that this does not bode well for Michelin.
#3
Actually, I blame the FIA. Michelin flew in new tires, but the FIA wouldn't let the teams use them. They also refused to add a chicane as a compromise to slow traffic down. Michelin issued a document saying they wouldn't be liable for the possible damage caused by tire failure.
I think the teams were right to pull out under the circumstances.
I think the teams were right to pull out under the circumstances.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is that the FIA's fault?
Bridgestone flew in the right tires, why should Michelin be given a break in the rules? Early in the season MS had to retire due to tire issues - did you see the Bridgestone teams issue letters saying thier tires would not suit the circumstances when it was widely known that they had tire problems? And remember - this was the 6th running of the USGP @ Indy - it's not like they've never been there before.
Michelin was simply poorly prepared - there is no other excuse.
I am really disappointed in what is happening in F1....many rules changes and the worst one has been to have a single set of tires for qualifying and the race.
Now Michelin realize they make a mistake and because they have the majority of the cars running their tires, they write a letter warning that thier tires will be unsafe for the race hoping to be able to substitute tires OR ADD a chicane! to the track to suit thier needs - how is that fair to Bridgestone.
To use the majority of teams to boycott the race is just plain wrong - Michelin should be penalized for this.
Single tire manufacturer (like in the past) would have prevented this problem....
Bridgestone flew in the right tires, why should Michelin be given a break in the rules? Early in the season MS had to retire due to tire issues - did you see the Bridgestone teams issue letters saying thier tires would not suit the circumstances when it was widely known that they had tire problems? And remember - this was the 6th running of the USGP @ Indy - it's not like they've never been there before.
Michelin was simply poorly prepared - there is no other excuse.
I am really disappointed in what is happening in F1....many rules changes and the worst one has been to have a single set of tires for qualifying and the race.
Now Michelin realize they make a mistake and because they have the majority of the cars running their tires, they write a letter warning that thier tires will be unsafe for the race hoping to be able to substitute tires OR ADD a chicane! to the track to suit thier needs - how is that fair to Bridgestone.
To use the majority of teams to boycott the race is just plain wrong - Michelin should be penalized for this.
Single tire manufacturer (like in the past) would have prevented this problem....
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Under a Shady Palm
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chazmo,Jun 19 2005, 08:37 PM
I just feel terrible for the folks who were at Indy today.
I think Michelin should be sued to within an inch of their existence. I know the track owners will most likely have to fend off some lawsuits. They were correct in not appearing for the awards ceremony. I also loved the way Schumacher and Barichello behaved on the podium, refusing to even open their champagne bottles.
Montero's behavior on the podium was understandable; after all, he was the only one who actually won a race - the Ferrari wins were a given against Minardi and Jordan.
I have a suggestion - boycott Michelin. I intend to.
: drive::d rive:
Gerry
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Michelin was clearly at fault. Do you think Michelin would have given a hoot if Bridgestone had the same problems? They should be fined within an inch of their bank account, and if F1 goes to a single tire supplier format next year, it should be Bridgestone who is the supplier.
I'm sure glad I didn't fly in and pay inflated hotel prices to see a crappy race.
I'm sure glad I didn't fly in and pay inflated hotel prices to see a crappy race.
#10
Originally Posted by matrix,Jun 19 2005, 08:09 PM
........Single tire manufacturer (like in the past) would have prevented this problem....
As long as it isn't Michelin!