S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

We aren't dull...:)

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 11:10 AM
  #21  
Kyras's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,930
Likes: 5,435
From: Loveland, CO
Default

Bill's getting huffy!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 11:56 AM
  #22  
rjosey8385's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
From: Rockwall, TEXAS!
Default

I know - that was worse than my reaction to being called Middle Aged - I just sulked quietly!

And who lives to be 100??? Nobody in my family has made it that far (close, but at this point in my family you'd be middle-aged). And does middle-aged really start in the middle, or does it start in the middle of the middle (which would be a few years to one side or the other). And how do you explain that AARP stuff -huh?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 02:32 AM
  #23  
2kturkey's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne!
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Aug 24 2004, 05:08 AM
That math is bogus. First off, we live to be 100. If you die sooner, it's your own fault. Second off, Middle age starts in the middle, so that's 50. I'm not even 49 yet so get out of here with that "middle aged" stuff.
Not quite Bill. The maths (yes it has an 's') is quite correct.

My 3 score years and ten comes from the bible (as I am sure you are aware). Actually, we live to around 75 (I have no idea where you got 100 from but we both know the stats don't support this). Assuming 75, our middle age is still from 25 to 50.

You're confusing (deliberately I suspect) the mid point and the middle. Clearly, middle age doesn't start in the middle of your life unless it lasts for a nanosecond and is gone instantaneously.

Let's choose to use your argument that we live to 100 and middle age starts at 50 (and is gone in a nanosecond). If this is the case then all the years before 50 are youth and then every moment after is old age. So it doesn't matter which way you cut it, from 50 you are a senior.

You may be a lawyer but you're certainly not a mathematician.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 04:37 AM
  #24  
Chazmo's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,315
Likes: 45
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

He'll really be a lawyer if he can convince you that he's right, turk!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 05:01 AM
  #25  
MsPerky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 45,175
Likes: 4,095
From: Arlington, VA
Default

^
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 06:37 AM
  #26  
WireGuy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Warwick
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Aug 23 2004, 02:08 PM
That math is bogus. First off, we live to be 100. If you die sooner, it's your own fault. Second off, Middle age starts in the middle, so that's 50. I'm not even 49 yet so get out of here with that "middle aged" stuff.
I'm planning on living to 130. The human body has that genetic potential, and with a healthy dose of science to back me up as I reach 100. Why not?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 06:59 AM
  #27  
dean's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,478
Likes: 0
Default

I'm chiming in since I haven't taught a Developmental Biology class in a while, and I'm getting antsy.
The life expectancy for a person born in the U.S. in 1986 is 71 for males and 78 for females. For a person born in the U.S. in 1780, the life expectancy was 28!
Over the vast majority of human history, humans generally didn't live much past the age of 40. Humans usually died of infectious diseases or parasites long before showing the overall effects of senescence, so aging is a relatively new phenomenon.
Personally, I wear my age as a badge of honor. I've had to dodge a lot of "bullets" to get to this point. Although, had I known that I was going to live this long, I would've taken better care of myself.

Dean
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 07:02 AM
  #28  
MsPerky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 45,175
Likes: 4,095
From: Arlington, VA
Default

Well, I think everyone has focused on the "old" part of the statement in my original post. But the guy's point was that we have the most interesting forum! We just happen to be "old". Or maybe that is beside the point...
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 07:20 AM
  #29  
dean's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,478
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WireGuy,Aug 24 2004, 10:37 AM
I'm planning on living to 130. The human body has that genetic potential, and with a healthy dose of science to back me up as I reach 100. Why not?
You'll be breaking the record. The oldest human to be documented (from the Georgia region of what was the U.S.S.R.) lived to be 121.
Generally speaking, genes have less to do with longevity than science - diet, lifestyle,, etc.. Once you've gone past your reproductive peak, your genes really don't "care" what happens to you.

Dean
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 07:26 AM
  #30  
Lainey's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65,412
Likes: 4,696
From: Smalltown
Default

Originally Posted by rjosey8385,Aug 23 2004, 02:56 PM
And how do you explain that AARP stuff -huh?
That AARP stuff started arriving at our house as Rick approached 50......so I signed him up. We like discounts!

Next thing I know, I get my very own AARP card as a spouse (who is not 50 yet, I may add).

I put it in my wallet figured on using it for hotel discounts or whatever. Next thing I know it's saving me $100.00 on my very first pair of (you got it) bi-focals!

Sometimes is pays to be Vintage!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 AM.