I had a look at the source code too..

Although the homepage uses images from a different location, they appear to be the same size and the HTML constructed in the same way for the header_01 and header_03 images, but the middle section is done using "background-image:" CSS, but in slightly different ways on the two pages.

Could be the different way in which that element is constructed?? or more than likely the way in which IE handles it. If it is the latter then I guess it might be tricky to fix (i.e its buggy in IE) so replacing the "background-image" with a normal HTML <IMG SRC=> might be simpler as with the header_01 and header_03.

Of course, I don't really know what I'm on about so that could be a complete load of crap

 

It's a CSS error somewhere. The styles applied the same, I'm not sure what you mean by 'CSS, but in slightly different ways on the two pages' code looks the same to me, but I might be missing something. It's the CSS file that doesnt compensate for IE's shitty rendering engine.

 

Fixed.

 

I'll check it in IE at work today

 

Yep works in IE for me now too

What I was on about ref CSS error was that this
bit was constructed differently on each page.. or at least I though it was. One said style='background.... the other was something else - maybe I was hallucinating

 

you were hallucinating

 

Oooh. It's fixed. I can sleep at night now

May I just take this opportunity to say what a great site this is etc. etc. etc.

I'll keep quiet now, and go back under my stone....

 

it works