Need help with site regulations
Former Moderator
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,826
Likes: 5
From: Denver CO
It was not an S2000.org link that I asked to be removed (there wasn't even a link to s2000.org in his sig at the time). It was a link to a site created by one of the post whores that contains porn and everything else we have tried to avoid so as not to get censored by corporate firewalls. I was very clear about what needed to be removed in the PM I sent him as you can see in his first post.
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,274
Likes: 4
From: Toronto, Canada
Injecting pseudo-facts into the equation isn't helping. I highly doubt Strike has nothing better to do than stalk you. S2000.org is fine, there is no problem having that in your signature. Please PM me the other link and I'll look at it. If the site contains material unsuitable for posting on s2ki.com then it's likely we won't allow it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Originally posted by cthree
Injecting pseudo-facts into the equation isn't helping. I highly doubt Strike has nothing better to do than stalk you. S2000.org is fine, there is no problem having that in your signature. Please PM me the other link and I'll look at it. If the site contains material unsuitable for posting on s2ki.com then it's likely we won't allow it.
Injecting pseudo-facts into the equation isn't helping. I highly doubt Strike has nothing better to do than stalk you. S2000.org is fine, there is no problem having that in your signature. Please PM me the other link and I'll look at it. If the site contains material unsuitable for posting on s2ki.com then it's likely we won't allow it.
Erik - I said this is how I *feel* right now, it's not a 'pseudo-fact'. Being condescending to a paying customer doesn't make you look good.