I agree with Blade, surely your post is an example of a waste of bandwidth.

 

That is offending...I have 1000 plus posts...and I feel that I have helped alot of members out on this board...

 

Heh, I suppose Rasputin314 is having a bad day or something like that. Anyway, I suppose his message is going only in the negative direction. If more are going to reply, I suppose he's gonna cop more of it.

Anyway, I do however support the tuning down of graphics like some other members have suggested. It's true that most show similar cars to one another, after all we all own the same car and I suppose signatures don't need an extended "stock S2K image" ultimately.

Unless it's significantly modified or prove to be something special in someway none-the-less outstanding, it sure does cut down on bandwidth overall. So I suggest, how about site operators and moderators cut some slack and get this in line? I don't like looking at signatures with stock cars all over and over again all in different colors.

 

I think Rasputin314 has taken a chance to make a valid point. Certainly there needs to be a balance between using the board for flip conversation as opposed to only for technical interaction. And the graphics needs to be mentioned every once in a while.. it always seems to result in smaller graphic sigs. Maybe we can all be more careful and take the majority of the banter to the off-topic area. As always, most of us could be more careful, just like he could have been more diplomatic.

 

hmmm...my evil twin wants to post Moby Dick

 

Hello everyone!

 

Hmmm,

Only 16 replies & 151 viewings. Does this support or or contravert the point of your post? I am unsure.

or should I merely have phrased this: WTF?

Nick Graves
Honda S2000
Black/Black
1997 cm3 4 cyl 4-stroke otto motor
4 valves per cylinder
etc

 

I am a bit shocked that some smart-ass didn't respond with a 1600x1200 image attached

 

Gee I wonder how many posts I have

 

Gee only 166