Finally lowered

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Mar 28, 2009 | 08:48 PM

#11

alSpeed2k

Community Organizer

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 10,599

Likes: 79

From: The 604

Looking good!

Mar 28, 2009 | 08:58 PM

#12

Koski

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 1,140

Likes: 0

thanks everyone, i'll look more into the specs' i hear UK is good though, i haven't looked into it at all...so we'll see!

Mar 28, 2009 | 09:38 PM

#13

Koski

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 1,140

Likes: 0

Looks like I'll be going with UK SPEC...*actually, i wonder how the tire wear would be with this spec...*

Front
Caster Left 6

Mar 28, 2009 | 09:57 PM

#14

JL9000

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 4,349

Likes: 0

Ricer!

You shouldn't see any camber wear with the UK alignment if you drive the car as it's meant to be driven.

Mar 29, 2009 | 09:04 AM

#15

Koski

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 1,140

Likes: 0

That's what I like to hear, thanks charles

Mar 29, 2009 | 09:38 AM

#16

i_s2k

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 1,093

Likes: 0

Nice start to your mods, what's next on your list?

Mar 29, 2009 | 12:56 PM

#17

WyattH

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 8,106

Likes: 2

From: PNW

UK camber isn't too bad. "more than" -2' (so lower absolute value) in the rear should not result in any camber wear.
toe would be more of a concern.
i recommend a little. the pnw guys know their shit and recommend a little. it can help make the rear less twitchy and catch tighter. i think front was 1/16'' total toe in and rear was 1/8'' total? double check, though.