Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

17" vs 18"

Thread Tools
 
Old May 13, 2009 | 04:53 PM
  #11  
Riceboi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 2
From: Nor Cal
Default

if you're staying NA I think I would go with 17's, if you're gonna boost later on just get 18's because they look nicer and you won't notice the slow down.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 04:37 AM
  #12  
my2ks2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From: nc
Default

i agree with those that say 18s look too big sometimes. i'd go 17s, i think the tire/wheel ratio looks better. also 17" tires are gonna be a good bit cheaper.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 08:58 AM
  #13  
Ezekiel55's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

I have 18 ce28ns in Gunmetal on my car, I love how they look. They are still lighter then stock, so I didnt notice it slow down any, it also depends on what type of tires you get on them. Im lowered about an inch and they fit nice and snug.
I guess you might notice more of a difference if you are going form 16inch ap1 wheels to 18s, then I did with my 17 to 18s.
Either way, Get those Volks!
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #14  
PTHermes's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

I love the look of my 18's, but I will agree with the others in stock form the car feels slower. I also went to 255 on the rear and have to try hard to break it loose.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 06:43 PM
  #15  
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Wink

I was wondering the same thing, I got 17's they look big enough jut get 255's on the back





Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #16  
leo520's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 12
Default

i have a j's body with 25 mm fron/rear fenders ,also vortech sc'ed so i go with 18's...
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 07:30 PM
  #17  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Actual performance difference isn't going to be that great. I'd go 17's to save money, and I like the look better.

Personally, I wish they made serious, wider high-perf street rubber in 16". I'd rather be on ~275/40-16 rears and 245/45-16 fronts than on 17's or 18's. But the tires don't exist...
Reply
Old May 17, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #18  
THESPY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: WhereTheGaynessWillMakeYouDizy
Default

Go with 17s if you want to save money. I have 18s but I am boosted so I dont know how much "slower" the car would feel if I was NA on 18s.
Reply
Old May 17, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #19  
vollrathian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 0
From: west palm beach
Default

17's enough said
Reply
Old May 19, 2009 | 06:18 AM
  #20  
Almostlude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 2
From: Glenview/Northbrook
Default

I went with 18's because I got a great deal on my wheels. Wedsport TC005's, they weigh in at 16.9lb (rear) and 15.5lbs (front). I didn't notice a this slow down that everone is commenting on (i am NA). I'm assuming that it is because of the unsprung weight reduction particularly. If I could get the TC005's in 17, I'd strongly consider it and put my 18's on my TSX.

So... if anyone has a set of these in 17" let me know
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 AM.