Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PF01SS Squared Setup

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 29, 2018 | 04:35 PM
  #41  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by brc80
Great should I do the drop before the wheels or after? Or does it not matter?
Do the drop after the wheels, since you will need to get an alignment at that point, and then you can adjust the camber to the wheels to insure you wont rub. Not that you should anyway, unless you are way out of spec. But this is the best way to go about it I think

Last edited by s2000Junky; Nov 29, 2018 at 04:40 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 02:15 PM
  #42  
brc80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

So I pulled the trigger on some PF01's/ 17x9 +60 all around. I was hoping to go with a 235/40 up front to be as safe as I can up front, but the tire selection seems to be almost non existent in that size. From a daily driving perspective does anyone see anything wrong with pairing a 235/45 with a 255/40 rear?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 02:32 PM
  #43  
DanielZan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 7
From: San Francisco CA
Default

Pulled the trigger as well They arrived today!
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 02:40 PM
  #44  
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 51
Default

Originally Posted by brc80
So I pulled the trigger on some PF01's/ 17x9 +60 all around. I was hoping to go with a 235/40 up front to be as safe as I can up front, but the tire selection seems to be almost non existent in that size. From a daily driving perspective does anyone see anything wrong with pairing a 235/45 with a 255/40 rear?
Yes, the taller front (25.4") is bigger than the either a 225/255 (25") or OEM 215/245 (24.7"). It would raise the nose relative to the tail, hurting aerodynamics. It is doubtful you'd see any advantage over a 245/40 in fit or traction, and it would probably be worse.

With those rims it won't be a street class autocross car, and without modifications carefully within the rules, it wouldn't be a competitive or possibly legal STR car either.

You would be safest from a street fit and overall performance application with 245 square, with 245/255 being about the same. 255 square would be ok. It is used on lowered S2000s in STR and I've seen it on a street class S2000, squeezed on a 7" wide rim but it rubbed in the front. On a lot of the large front tire with unmodified fenders you will see many threads here on rubbing.

With modified fenders on lowered S2000s people have run as large as 315/30-18 (25.6" tall and wide). One of those ran a 335/30-18 in the rear, but that was a Hoosier A7 slick that is also 25.6" tall. The other 335/30-18s are 25.9". In addition to the fender and suspension modifications, those cars ran an OS Giken Salisbury rear because they had enough traction to lift the inside wheels in a turn. Just to show the limits...this thread isn't about getting the most.

More than size, is what tire model are you getting? For autocross there are only two: Bridgestone RE71r and BFG Rival S 1.5. For street use or track days there are more. The Michelin P4S would be my street choice. It doesn't come in a 255/40 so 245 square would be the choice.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 02:40 PM
  #45  
brc80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

What size did you end up going with, and what size tires as well?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 02:41 PM
  #46  
brc80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Yes, the taller front (25.4") is bigger than the either a 225/255 (25") or OEM 215/245 (24.7"). It would raise the nose relative to the tail, hurting aerodynamics. It is doubtful you'd see any advantage over a 245/40 in fit or traction, and it would probably be worse.

With those rims it won't be a street class autocross car, and without modifications carefully within the rules, it wouldn't be a competitive or possibly legal STR car either.

You would be safest from a street fit and overall performance application with 245 square, with 245/255 being about the same. 255 square would be ok. It is used on lowered S2000s in STR and I've seen it on a street class S2000, squeezed on a 7" wide rim but it rubbed in the front. On a lot of the large front tire with unmodified fenders you will see many threads here on rubbing.

With modified fenders on lowered S2000s people have run as large as 315/30-18 (25.6" tall and wide). One of those ran a 335/30-18 in the rear, but that was a Hoosier A7 slick that is also 25.6" tall. The other 335/30-18s are 25.9". In addition to the fender and suspension modifications, those cars ran an OS Giken Salisbury rear because they had enough traction to lift the inside wheels in a turn. Just to show the limits...this thread isn't about getting the most.

More than size, is what tire model are you getting? For autocross there are only two: Bridgestone RE71r and BFG Rival S 1.5. For street use or track days there are more. The Michelin P4S would be my street choice. It doesn't come in a 255/40 so 245 square would be the choice.
Thanks for the quick reply. This is a 100% street car. No Track or Autocross. Just want to go with a nice safe street setup.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 04:57 PM
  #47  
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 51
Default

Originally Posted by brc80
Thanks for the quick reply. This is a 100% street car. No Track or Autocross. Just want to go with a nice safe street setup.
Then I'd go 245/40 square with the Michelin P4S: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...um=44YR7PS4SXL

Note there is a $100 rebate that expires December 14.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 05:33 PM
  #48  
brc80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Is 245/40 Square better than 245/255?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 07:25 PM
  #49  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by brc80
Is 245/40 Square better than 245/255?
Performance/grip wise no. Only if you want to rotate tires front to back. I prefer the performance aspects on this car, so id do the 245/255.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2018 | 08:34 PM
  #50  
DanielZan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 7
From: San Francisco CA
Default

im going with 235/255
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:55 AM.