Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

335i test

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #21  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

Nice torque curve. One of the ways the M division distinguishes its cars is the LSD, oddly lacking in non-M models.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 12:12 PM
  #22  
trivium's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Aug 12 2006, 02:14 PM
Forced induction is the wave of the future.
Forced induction applications on mass produced autos has been around since before you or I was born. You make it sound like the Turbocharger was introduced last year.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #23  
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by AZDelt,Aug 13 2006, 12:41 AM
My guess is the 335 is going to be a quick yet serene ride.
exact reason why i compare the 335 with the g35c.

100+hp&tq eh? would u happen to have info on exactly what they did to achieve that? i'm just curious about how much potential the stock turbo's have and how much more boost the aluminum block can handle safely...
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #24  
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by trivium,Aug 13 2006, 12:12 PM
Forced induction applications on mass produced autos has been around since before you or I was born. You make it sound like the Turbocharger was introduced last year.
i believe mr. quikag is sayin that TC's will be more widely used in the future than it is now.

ie. more cars from more manufactures will come equipped with TC's from the factory than the current market.

i'd love for Honda to produce a turbo roadster as replacement to the s2k.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #25  
derryck's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
From: Orange Park
Default

Dang, thats a whole bunch more power than the M3!
Torque yes...power no.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 10:42 AM
  #26  
J3ffro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
From: Kona, HI
Default

Originally Posted by fusionchickenleg,Aug 13 2006, 03:47 PM
exact reason why i compare the 335 with the g35c.

100+hp&tq eh? would u happen to have info on exactly what they did to achieve that? i'm just curious about how much potential the stock turbo's have and how much more boost the aluminum block can handle safely...
335 v. G35 seems like a good matchup, anyone throwing any M3 (E92/E46/E36 hell even E30, there isn't a comparison to be made) in there is missing the boat.


Can't say at this point about ESS, in a couple weeks I may have that info.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #27  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,510
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by trivium,Aug 13 2006, 12:12 PM
Forced induction applications on mass produced autos has been around since before you or I was born. You make it sound like the Turbocharger was introduced last year.
I agree with that. However, it will become more predominant in the future as people are now expecting a lot of power and very good fuel efficiency. Forced induction was not a route that BMW, Honda, Toyota, etc. typically went for mainstream vehicles. Expect to see a lot more of them in the future.

The turbo inline six from BMW and the turbo 4 banger from Honda (RDX) is just the start of a much higher percentage of mainstream cars having forced induction.

It will become the norm rather than the exception over the next several years.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #28  
nalVle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Aug 14 2006, 02:59 PM
I agree with that. However, it will become more predominant in the future as people are now expecting a lot of power and very good fuel efficiency. Forced induction was not a route that BMW, Honda, Toyota, etc. typically went for mainstream vehicles. Expect to see a lot more of them in the future.

The turbo inline six from BMW and the turbo 4 banger from Honda (RDX) is just the start of a much higher percentage of mainstream cars having forced induction.

It will become the norm rather than the exception over the next several years.


took long enough
-Chris
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #29  
Poindexter's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 3
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Originally Posted by GPMike,Aug 12 2006, 11:00 PM
Think for a moment...You can get near M3 performance in a "new" 335 for the same price (possibly less) as a pre-owned 3-4 year M3. Many people will consider "not" getting the E46 M3 and go for a "new" 335 since it is "new." E46 M3 prices will have to come down for dealers to move them off the lots. Need proof? See the price trend of used C5 Z06s when the C6 came out. End of discussion. I don't need to drive it to know what will happen to prices. If I am wrong, which I won't be....then laugh
Your Vette reference is off because you're comparing the same model. The C6 was an upgrade to the C5. The 335i is not an upgrade nor a replacement to the M3. I guarantee that when these cars come out, people who have driven the M3 will not like the stock handling and understeer of the new 335i. It may be almost as fast in a straight line, but it won't be everything. It will take some work (coilovers, sway bars, bushings, tires, wieght reduction, etc...) to make the 335i perform as well as the current M3.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #30  
565565's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: bobville
Default

[QUOTE=Poindexter,Aug 14 2006, 01:40 PM] Your Vette reference is off because you're comparing the same model.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 AM.