Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

EJ25 or 4G63

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-10-2013, 09:29 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JRu17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Look let's not get negative here, it's simply a personal preference to have more useable power without having to be at 7k+ rpms all the time
Old 02-10-2013, 09:49 AM
  #12  

 
billios996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 1,282
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I'm a big fan of the 4g63. They'll handle tons of boost and can be built to spin up to 9k+ also. That being said, I'd never stick an iron block in this car, you'll throw off the balance. If you're going through the effort, build the F22C.
Old 02-10-2013, 09:57 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Rubn1out4GudLuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5,268
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So TORQUE is what you're after, OP?!! Time to step up to the big boys :-)
Old 02-10-2013, 10:50 AM
  #14  
Registered User

 
XtC-604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The EJ or the 4G are horrible ideas.... They are horizontally mounted...with the idea of having 4wd or fwd. Unless you can swap over the full all wheel drive from the EVO including AYC and what not...then this is a really moot swap. You want torque? V8, 2JZ, RB32. But the stock F will do 450 reliably with a turbo.
Old 02-10-2013, 11:01 AM
  #15  
Registered User

 
s2klariat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

An unopened, bone stock F20/22 can (and has several times) net 800+ wheel horsepower with the right turbo/fueling setup (e85 of course). You claim to know a lot about the "automobile industry", but maybe you should research more before making such a bold comment. I've come from the world of DSM's and 4G63's. Yes, it is a remarkable engine, but far from reliable. Take a browse in the forced induction section of the forum, you'll see several builds at well over 450rwhp. The weak link in the s2000 isn't the engine, it's the drive train. Boost the f series, swap in a V160 transmission and a Ford 8.8 rearend, and you can beat on it all day with no regard.
Old 02-10-2013, 05:55 PM
  #16  

 
bkowa092's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I'm pretty sure everyone is getting trolled. If not...I feel bad for the OP.
Old 02-10-2013, 06:20 PM
  #17  

 
Presto123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Miramar, FloriDUH
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The only swap I deem worthy is an LS motor.
Old 02-10-2013, 06:52 PM
  #18  
Syn
Registered User

 
Syn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have to agree with many others here. If you are going to the trouble of swapping a motor, do it right the first time and put an LSx in it. Going to another 4-cylinder is a complete waste of time and money if you ask me. The F20/F22 have forged everything from the factory and can handle more boost than a stock 4G63 and probably an EJ-whatever (I can say I don't know much about the latter engine). The 4G63 is known to be an exceptionally strong motor but most people seem to forget that in stock form they can't really be pushed any further (or even as far) as a stock F20/F22.

So yeah, if you are going to spend the time and money fabbing a motor swap: first of all more power to you, but second of all please reconsider trying to put in a 'better' 4-cylinder as you aren't really going to get much farther. Go big and put in a heads/cam LSx. Hell, boost it while you're at it.
Old 02-10-2013, 07:57 PM
  #19  
Registered User

 
insideoutoreo699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This shit is pretty nasty

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV7C_BRDOII[/media]
Old 02-10-2013, 08:03 PM
  #20  
Registered User

 
meccjoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4wheelsoffury
Lol @ the ej being a more reliable engine than an F series. EJ's have always been the weak point in the wrx/sti, specifically the pistons/rings, not counting the wrx's 5 speed. If you hang around here long enough you'll find the F series is whats makes the s2k and the drivetrain is the weak link. Stock block F's are well documented to hold well up to 6-700hp without any issue for many, many thousands of miles but the diff and trans are what won't hold up to it. Most people making big power are moving on to supra 6spd getrags and ford 8.8 rears.

On the other hand, the 4g's will also take a hell of a beating and might as well be Mitsubishi's reliable equivalent to the F and should make some more torque. There is really little point in swapping out an F series unless you have to be unique or you must have torque, in which case you effectively bought the wrong car.

I'm all for swapping engines and making interesting frankensteins out of cars but you have to keep in mind how expensive and how much trouble and headaches are involved. And the s2k isn't a car that needs an engine swap.
Completely agree, however EJ's do make a sexy sound though when using the stock UEL header.


Quick Reply: EJ25 or 4G63



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:19 AM.