Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

EVO 8/9 vs. S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #11  
waltk88's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 92
From: SoCal
Default

I owned a mildly modded Evo IX and a Comptech SC S2000 at the same time. The Evo has better steering feel than S2000 and is much easier to drive up to its cornering limits. I was much quicker on the track in the Evo.

Having said that, I would pick the S2000 over the Evo for driving fun:
Convertible
S2000 shifter
High rpm pull and VTEC engine note

I hated how the Evo compelled any boy racer within eyeshot to chase you down and then demonstrate their mad skillz.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #12  
2007 Zx-10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,149
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by waltk88,Nov 23 2008, 07:42 AM
I hated how the Evo compelled any boy racer within eyeshot to chase you down and then demonstrate their mad skillz.
Let's face it, the Evo 8/9 is an icon of "boy racer". What is the primary reason for the high maintenance costs, the AWD?

It's amazing these engines last that long with a steady diet of 22 psi.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 11:01 AM
  #13  
shyong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Plano
Default

[QUOTE=2007 Zx-10,Nov 23 2008, 05:20 PM] Let's face it, the Evo 8/9 is an icon of "boy racer".
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #14  
blkwidow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
From: Paradise Hills / SD
Default

Evo is not rice at all. I don't think I've ever seen a riced out EVO. Now a Lancer, well you all know that story.

As for the Evo being a more fun car to drive then an S, I just don't see it. I've driven both pretty hard before I made my decision. As you can see I chose the S.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #15  
nightwalker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

An Evo maintenance is...
expensive brembo sized brake pads, and 12.6" front rotors and 11" vented rear rotors

THREE differential fluids to change

Mobil1 oil only, or any other synthetic

91 gas, that it drinks like a drunk in a brewery.

235/45/17 or wider tires at all four corners that have to be replaced all at one time, or risk ruining your center diff.

The Evo has the "boy racer" look because of society.

If you look back at the early 90s, people were putting big spoilers on their cars, buying hoods with vents, and installing all these "race inspired" parts to make their cars look racy.

-The hood on the Evo is aluminum, with an aluminum grill that's vented to help extract heat from the turbo

-The front bumper has huge openings to feed the oil cooler (right side vent) the intercooler, (middle) and intake (left side)

-The rear spoiler on an Evo is made of carbon to stiffen it so it doesn't wobble at high speeds like the STI's wing. It's also placed high up to take advantage of the air coming off the roof

-The vortex generator (spikes on the roof) was engineered by Mitsubishi in a wind tunnel to help direct the air onto the spoiler and keep it off the rear windshield. ...and coincidentally, you find many Hondas, and other cars doing the same visual mods to their cars ..... just to look racy....

I don't think I have to explain the Recaro seats, Brembo brakes, Advan tires and Enkei wheels do I?
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #16  
Jacques79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Default

Evo has better steering feel.

For the rest the differences are pretty obvious.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 07:01 PM
  #17  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by aklucsarits,Nov 22 2008, 11:23 PM
I own an Evo IX and an S2000.

The S2000 is more fun and rewarding to drive. Chicks dig it.

The Evo is faster and more practical. Chicks hate it.

Andrew
Is the Evo faster from a roll? I...*ahem*...had a friendly contest with one outside Tyler a few weeks ago and pulled about a half car length on him from 40 mph to 110 mph. It was close enough that even a mediocre shift by either of us would have changed the outcome.

I generally don't run cars so I have no idea if the outcome was typical or not. Neither of us blew a shift so it was a pretty fair run, all things considered.

I talked to the owner after the run and he was bone stock. I have a K&N FIPK and that's it.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #18  
shyong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Plano
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy,Nov 24 2008, 04:01 AM
Is the Evo faster from a roll? I...*ahem*...had a friendly contest with one outside Tyler a few weeks ago and pulled about a half car length on him from 40 mph to 110 mph. It was close enough that even a mediocre shift by either of us would have changed the outcome.

I generally don't run cars so I have no idea if the outcome was typical or not. Neither of us blew a shift so it was a pretty fair run, all things considered.

I talked to the owner after the run and he was bone stock. I have a K&N FIPK and that's it.
Not typical at all. That Evo should've at your S2000, stock for stock.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #19  
shyong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Plano
Default

Originally Posted by blkwidow,Nov 23 2008, 08:46 PM
Evo is not rice at all. I don't think I've ever seen a riced out EVO. Now a Lancer, well you all know that story.

As for the Evo being a more fun car to drive then an S, I just don't see it. I've driven both pretty hard before I made my decision. As you can see I chose the S.
Question is...have you owned an Evo? Driving a car pretty hard for a limited time hardly qualifies you to judge a car. I've had the pleasure of owning both the AP1 and AP2...along with the Evo X. I have access to both cars (ap1 and X). Hands down the the X is more fun to drive. But that's just my opinion.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #20  
TheDonEffect's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,363
Likes: 636
Default

Originally Posted by nightwalker,Nov 23 2008, 01:40 AM
TheDon has it backwards. The Evos don't have the crankwalk problem, IV gen and up. The DSMs were the ones with crankwalk problems. If you had a DSM then you should have known that the 6 bolt 90-91 motors were the one's to have. The Evo IV was the first 4G63 with the tranny and timing belt positions switched.

btw, my Evo has 124k miles, and I run 22psi of boost daily. It's been this way for a year and a half now.

Evos get bad raps because people think that you can rev the motor to 7k and drop the clutch. Little rich kids would buy Evos brand new, break them, then talk shit on the internet.

I've owned mine for 3 years now, and the only drivetrain piece I have replaced is the clutch.

I have friends who are making 400 wheel and 320lbs of torque on the stock engine, headgasket, bottom end, and stock drivetrain with only an upgraded clutch.

Coincidentally, one of my friends likes to drag race his S2K. He is on his third rear diff.
Actually, the dsm built cars were the ones to have, and mits took over sometime during 94 when they were still building 1gs. Basically what you wanted was a dsm built 6bolt motor, but there were dsm built 7 bolt motors in the later 1Gs which was later taken over by mitsubishi, but yes I agree that what you want is the earlier models (I thought it was up to 92) since they were the 6 bolt motors. When they went to the 7bolt motors, all of the years had the problem. They say that mitsu corrected the problem by the late 98 models, but there were reports that folks with 99s had the problem too, but fewer, but that could be due to the lower sales volume as well.
And I agree with the trans being sturdy and that a lot of the bad rap comes from kids driving their cars like morons, and that most of the problems associated with the evo comes from that.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 PM.