Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

EVO 8/9 vs. S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 05:31 AM
  #31  
patinum's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,572
Likes: 18
From: Second City
Default

Originally Posted by nightwalker,Nov 25 2008, 01:05 AM
3000 Evos made every year from 03-06 don't quite make them "civics" but, ...ok
That seems low since according to wikipedia there were 7000 S2000's made every year (in the US) between 03 and 06. Can you site your source? (not trying to be a dick, but it seems really low).

And I'm not saying it's a civic in the sense that it's cheap car for the masses, but back in the day, the civic was THE car to have for people to mod - in terms of potential and availability. Now it's evo's/sti's.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 07:14 AM
  #32  
foxy_s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: Brit in Athens, Greece
Default

Originally Posted by aklucsarits,Nov 23 2008, 07:23 AM
I own an Evo IX and an S2000.

The S2000 is more fun and rewarding to drive. Chicks dig it.

The Evo is faster and more practical. Chicks hate it.

Andrew
Owners of both FTW! Well said my friend, you are uniquely qualified to judge.

/thread.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #33  
dparm's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
From: Oak Park, IL
Default

The Evo always felt "cheap" to me. Feels like a cheap car with lots of expensive parts thrown in...the interior is an absolute joke, it feels like an economy car in there (just with expensive seats).

Sure it's fast and fun, but I just couldn't get past that cheapness when car shopping. But bang-for-the buck it's hard to beat. Along with the MazdaSpeed3 and Cobalt SS it's insane how cheap you can get a really fast car for.


S2000 is just a totally different vehicle...FMR convertible. I chose the S. **** practicality, I'm young and unmarried. I have the rest of my life to own a "practical" car. I don't give two shits about a backseat or big trunk when I've got the top down and the wind in my hair.


This is an interesting topic though. :-)
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #34  
s2kpdx01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
Default

Owned both:
S2k: more rewarding to drive, can be a very fast track car for really cheap, big tires, big wing, tear the interior out..tough to beat

evo: much more practical, much faster in normal situations (40 mph in 4th and you need to go), easy to drive fast
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #35  
weneversleep's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.Aqua,Nov 23 2008, 12:26 AM
I actually went and test drove an evo IV
An Evo IV? Really? That was a Japan-only car... they didn't even begin importing to the UK until the V.

Seriously, though, the S2000 and Evo (any gen) are two completely different cars. Do you want a 2-seat FR convertible, or a 4-seat, 4-door AWD supercar? (and, yes, I call the Evo a supercar)

Both are great examples of their breed. I used to own an AP2 S2000, now I own an Evo X MR. I'm now looking for a nice Evo VIII or IX to turn into a track car...

--michael
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #36  
nightwalker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

You can search on EvoM.net or google it. Mitsu only sent 3k evos every year to the U.S.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #37  
Randizzle88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 0
From: COMPTON
Default

Just boost the S2000 and kill EVO/STI all day
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #38  
MrBean1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

For what it is the Evo isn't very fast (STI is faster) but they look nice. The Evo X MR is 5.4 0-60 and the 2009 Subaru Impreza WRXSTI is 4.7 for less money.

I heard the interior is terrible? Never been in one though.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #39  
matrix_squared's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
From: Midtown, Atlanta Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by aklucsarits,Nov 22 2008, 09:23 PM
I own an Evo IX and an S2000.

The S2000 is more fun and rewarding to drive. Chicks dig it.

The Evo is faster and more practical. Chicks hate it.

Andrew
Amen to that... i own both as well...

My wife hates the evo! Likes how it drives hates how it looks...

S2K on the other hand is the only car she`d want to have, i feel the same way too!

recently got another s2k(gpw) for me, since she keeps stealing my suzuka...

s2000 to be are better overall, i can live without my evo(but i do enjoy the power and torque of it). And for a sedan it actually looks nice in my opinion...

If i had to choose one of the two, it would be S2K... u can always supercharged it too
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 05:41 AM
  #40  
patinum's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,572
Likes: 18
From: Second City
Default

Originally Posted by nightwalker,Nov 25 2008, 11:44 PM
You can search on EvoM.net or google it. Mitsu only sent 3k evos every year to the U.S.
Tried searching and this is the first post I came up with:

http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.ph...ad.php?t=372618

Looks like there isn't a real definite answer though as my searches are coming up with anywhere between 4 and 7 thousand a year. This was the only post I found that cited a source.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 AM.