Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.
View Poll Results: HP -> Acceleration... not Torque!
HP is more important than Torque
58.62%
Torque is more important than HP
41.38%
Voters: 203. You may not vote on this poll

HP -> Acceleration... not Torque!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 08:30 AM
  #191  
wc_one's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Redford, MI
Default

Originally posted by Zoran


"At any given time" you choose what gear you want to be in for maximum acceleration (usually downshifting).

The gear that puts you the closest to your HP peak is the gear to choose, as that one will give you maximum acceleration at that given time.

If there's a gear that would put you exactly at your HP peak, that's the best you can do.

So really, at any given time, maximum acceleration occurs at the HP peak.

Again, reread my example above: If you are rolling at 60mph and 3rd gear puts you at your torque peak while a 2nd gear puts you at your HP peak, which gear do you choose for maximum acceleration at that time?
Again, you are assuming variable gear ratios. "At any given time" you are at one, fixed gear ratio. You cannot be at this gear ratio, choose to change gears, change gears, be at another gear ratio, all at the same time. I am not talking about what gear ratio you want or should be at, I'm talking about the gear ratio you are at which may be 1st or 6th or some imaginary gear it doesn't matter.

The formula is very simple.

F = m * a

Mass is fixed. Acceleration is maximized when force is maximized. Force is maximized when torque is maximized. End of calculation. If you're going to keep changing gear ratios and/or speed then your force keeps changing and you have to recalculate for each change. But "at any given time" you get max acceleration at max torque.

Don't confuse acceleration and speed. Torque is what "accelerates" a car. Horsepower is what makes a car "fast". Hence the title of this thread is both misleading and incorrect.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 08:40 AM
  #192  
wc_one's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Redford, MI
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Destiny2002
[B]the best overall run is done when shifting just beyond the hp peak, which drops the engine back near the torque peak in the next gear up.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 08:58 AM
  #193  
Destiny2002's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 2
From: Transporter
Default

Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 09:12 AM
  #194  
Destiny2002's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 2
From: Transporter
Default

Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 10:08 AM
  #195  
Zoran's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by wc_one
[B]

Again, you are assuming variable gear ratios.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 10:28 AM
  #196  
wc_one's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Redford, MI
Default

Originally posted by Zoran

You also keep avoiding my question:

You and I are driving the exact same car, rolling at 60mph. You are in your 3rd gear, at your torque peak. I am in my 2nd gear, at my HP peak. Who is going to pull ahead if we both mash the gas at the same time?
I already answered that question. Of course 2nd gear will pull ahead. Why? Because there's more torque. Stop comparing different gear ratios! That is the point I am trying to make. You keep comparing different gears, "what if" I'm in 2nd or "what if" I'm in 3rd, there is no "what if", you're either in 2nd or 3rd, you can't be in both at the same time. So at any given time you get max acceleration at max torque.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 11:42 AM
  #197  
Zoran's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by wc_one
[B]

I already answered that question.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 12:16 PM
  #198  
johnyboy32's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Not that ya'll aren't doing a fine job of arguing with each other, but I just thought I would toss a curiosity into the pot.

If it is indead torque that is responsible for (or even the best indicator of) accelleration, then why are those CVT transmissions programed to keep an engine at it's HP peak instead of torque peak?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 12:23 PM
  #199  
wc_one's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Redford, MI
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by johnyboy32
[B]Not that ya'll aren't doing a fine job of arguing with each other, but I just thought I would toss a curiosity into the pot.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 12:26 PM
  #200  
wc_one's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Redford, MI
Default

Originally posted by Zoran

"Yeah, if I was at 40mph in this gear I would be accelerating a lot faster". So what? You're NOT at 40mph and there's absolutely nothing you can do to change that (short of braking down to 40mph and losing the race big time).
Exactly! That's the only point I'm trying to make, nothing more. At your current speed you're accelerating slower because there's less torque. Nothing more.


It is MUCH harder to accelerate at higher speeds than it is at lower speeds (and this has nothing to do with air drag).

It is MUCH harder to get 0.5g's of acceleration out of a car at 80mph than it is to get the same 0.5g's of acceleration at 10mph.

Therefore it is absolutely meaningless to compare car's acceleration at 80mph and at 10mph.

What about 30mph vs 10mph?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:22 PM.