Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.
View Poll Results: Poll - EVO or STI?
EVO
55.70%
STI
44.30%
Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll

Poll - EVO or STI?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #1  
revhappy1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Medowlands Area
Default Poll - EVO or STI?

Just wondering what S2000 owners prefer?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:35 AM
  #2  
PedalFaster's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Evo -- handling's more important than power in my books.

Steve
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 12:47 PM
  #3  
sciolist's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Bend
Default

I'm not an S2000 owner, but I am considering it along with the Evo and STi. I've driven the S and the STi, but not the Evo. At this point I'm leaning toward the STi.

One thing that never seems to come up in these Evo vs STi debates is reliability. It seems to me that most, if not all of the STi's (very) relative shortcomings can be modded out if desired. How are you going to mod Mitsubishi's build quality out of the Evo?

Neither car is going to have the reliability of a n/a Honda, but for $30K I want something reasonably robust. I'll be the first to admit that I have little personal experience with either marque, but Sube seems like a much better medium/long term bet to me. Considering how close the Evo and STi are in performance, I think that's a major issue.

Paul
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #4  
stockae92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

Originally posted by PedalFaster
Evo -- handling's more important than power in my books.

Steve
ditto

just give me ACD, AYC and 6 speed on top of that
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 01:24 PM
  #5  
loki's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Here's all the other threads that have been posted about this if you want to see people's opinion who've answered this question over and over:

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/showthread.php?...?threadid=55149

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/showthread.php?...?threadid=91634

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/showthread.php?...threadid=136157

etc:
http://search.s2ki.com/search.php?q=evo+sti
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #6  
suprmonky73's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: charlotte, nc
Default

after going to an autocross this weekend and watching the evo's there do much better than the STi's , id go with evo.
and yes i know its a drivers race, but still my 2 cents
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 12:58 PM
  #7  
jemje2006's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 803
Likes: 4
Default

sacrifice performance for reliability. go STI if it's more reliable than EVO. you wont need extremely performance every day.
also, my friend just blew the 5 speed transmission of his 03 EVO GSR on the racetrack. be aware of MIT's quality.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #8  
bloodzombie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Default

I've never driven either one, so my opinion is based only on looks and the hatchback of the sti. Also, I just like subarus for some reason.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #9  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Having driven both the old and new STi(I) and an Evo 8 MR, I'm torn. No doubt, the Evo was the better driving experience, it simply blew away my expectations. I expect the Evo X would be even more impressive.

But if you're going to buy a car like this, likely your choice is influenced by a desire for day to day practicality. IMO, the '08 STi wins big on:
- room - the 5 door HB of the new STI is cavernous. No other vehicle on the market has such a great combination of performance and cargo/people capacity. The Evo X, OTOH, has a pitifully small trunk and non-folding seat.
- interior appearance
- reliability (esp. unknown on the Mitsu w/ all the new tech.)

In summary, I'd grab the Evo keys for a romp on a track or a hill country run, but would prob. sign the papers on an STI for a long term ownership experience of a car I'd have to live w/.

FWIW, much of the STI's relative handling disadvantage can supposedly be cured w/ a $500 investment in Cobb sway bars.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #10  
rwheelz's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 118
From: Montana
Default

I just picked up an 07 STI Limited, to replace my GS400 and complement the S2000. I considered both cars (but have only actually driven STI's), and although the Evo is cheaper and in some weird way I still miss my 2G Eclipse, the choice was easy for me.

Check out the limited if you prefer heated leather to fun-boy blue, and a reasonable trunk lip spoiler to the traditional shelf you see on STI's. The Evo had me in terms of aesthetics until I realized the limited was an option. The only thing I don't like about my car is the big, square, fugly taillights that you see on all imprezas.

Note: had I been planning to replace the S2000, I would have driven an Evo before buying and the decision may have been more difficult. I am quite certain I still would have gone with the STI though. If you are the kind of person who is going to replace the entire suspension anyway, I suspect the difference in handling between the two would be negligible.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 PM.