Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Spiritual Successor to the NSX: Evora?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-23-2009, 05:46 PM
  #31  
Registered User

 
exb00st's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by XtC-604,Jun 22 2009, 05:16 PM
I bet you that a NSX v6 in that Evora would be so HAWT
Putting a hand-built motor (which isn't much more powerful than its current motor) would only increase the price tremendously... and give ricers a boner.
Old 06-23-2009, 09:50 PM
  #32  

 
TheDonEffect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,027
Received 489 Likes on 373 Posts
Default

What changes were made between the camry v6 vs. the evora's v6? They pretty much make the same power. Leaving it unchanged, imo, wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, in fact I'd prefer if they just straight up dropped it, feels more reassuring that I could get the components straight from toyota.
ech, 75K is some duckets for this car, but it's very appealing to me. I wonder how the access to the engine bay looks, couldn't find any picks with the "hood" raised.
Old 06-23-2009, 11:40 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
reedkr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The NSX seemed to be Honda's showcase for their racing car showcase. Regardless of how good it seemed back then, in 2009 the US versions of the NSX are an inferior sports car to many, featuring an Accord-like interior, 210-220 lbs of torque, electric or lack of power steering all together and a relatively, by modern-day standards flexible chassis.

As far as Lotus' racing ventures go, this seems to be their toned down, GT version of an Elise rather than showcase of their latest racing technology so there's no comparsion.
Old 06-23-2009, 11:46 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Jacques79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmmm for the same price I'd get a 320HP mid-engine Cayman S.

Moar power, same curb weight, same engine location...
Old 06-24-2009, 06:53 AM
  #35  

 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 11,616
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jacques79,Jun 24 2009, 01:46 AM
Hmmm for the same price I'd get a 320HP mid-engine Cayman S.

Moar power, same curb weight, same engine location...
Old 06-24-2009, 07:51 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
bentheswift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheDonEffect,Jun 23 2009, 09:50 PM
What changes were made between the camry v6 vs. the evora's v6? They pretty much make the same power. Leaving it unchanged, imo, wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, in fact I'd prefer if they just straight up dropped it, feels more reassuring that I could get the components straight from toyota.
ech, 75K is some duckets for this car, but it's very appealing to me. I wonder how the access to the engine bay looks, couldn't find any picks with the "hood" raised.
I don't think there were any significant mechanical changes, but I'm sure Lotus "tuned" the ECU like they did with the 2ZZ. Though this year's Camry now has 270 SAE horsepower just like the Evora.


I also am eager to see a comparison between this and the boxster/cayman. Road and Track timed the 2010 Boxster S (310hp, $56.7k msrp) at 12.6 seconds in the quarter mile!!! And the car is rated at 29mpg highway (which should net it up to 35mpg in purely highway driving now that the ratings are all skewed).
Old 06-24-2009, 09:21 AM
  #37  

Thread Starter
 
AaronCompNetSys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 910
Received 54 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jacques79,Jun 24 2009, 03:46 AM
Hmmm for the same price I'd get a 320HP mid-engine Cayman S.

Moar power, same curb weight, same engine location...
As would I. Plan on it actually.
Old 06-24-2009, 06:36 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
adam's2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Forgettable - copying other cars doesn't cut it anymore
Old 06-25-2009, 09:41 AM
  #39  
Registered User

 
oscar_driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cercado
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For me, this is what the next NSX should look like, this is "spiritual" the successor:








btw still no word -@ least, last time i check- about who is making the engines for the P11, one thing for sure, is not Mercedes.

Oscar
Old 06-25-2009, 09:53 AM
  #40  
Registered User

 
oscar_driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cercado
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The fact is that the 97+ nsx's are not as fast as the new supercars of this era, is hard .. is just 290HP .. yet with weight savings and basic bolt ons, you have a fantastic reliable car that still can be beaten by few .... and is true ... most people have no idea b/c have never driven one the way that it should be ...

----
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOaG0Xa43PM [/media]



OScar
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rat
Tampa
0
03-01-2017 04:21 PM
Zygrene
Car and Bike Talk
4
08-18-2016 12:29 PM
ChriS_2k
Car Talk - Non S2000
35
08-14-2009 11:06 AM
CTMechE
New England S2000 Owners
2
05-04-2009 07:11 AM
DuMa
S2000 Talk
19
06-27-2005 11:17 PM



Quick Reply: Spiritual Successor to the NSX: Evora?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 AM.