Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Average Speed Cameras?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 18, 2010 | 04:15 AM
  #41  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

I rarely see those but I don't drive a BMW

I meant specifically "obstruction" in the ASC zones. The M25 zones are so busy that moving over for someone is pointless, the speeder will only make up one car gap before they are "obstructed" again.

In fact, getting anywhere near 50mph in the ASC zones near me would be an achievement in itself.

As pointed out above, any time savings gained from speeding are pretty insignificant anyway as the zones are rarely longer than a few miles.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 04:22 AM
  #42  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova,May 18 2010, 12:15 PM

I meant specifically "obstruction" in the ASC zones. The M25 zones are so busy that moving over for someone is pointless, the speeder will only make up one car gap before they are "obstructed" again.



As pointed out above, any time savings gained from speeding are pretty insignificant anyway as the zones are rarely longer than a few miles.
try the M4

that's accepted but doesn't answer the question about obstructiveness

1m 30s could be a very long time in some circumstances
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 04:49 AM
  #43  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,May 18 2010, 01:22 PM
try the M4

that's accepted but doesn't answer the question about obstructiveness

1m 30s could be a very long time in some circumstances
Not sure what, other than a medical emergency. Besides, any gains of that significance can be lost at traffic lights/roundabouts or other junctions once off the motorway - it's all pretty random and out of a driver's control really.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 05:01 AM
  #44  
Polemicist's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,May 18 2010, 12:22 PM
1m 30s could be a very long time in some circumstances
The central tenet of a fatuous argument is the only circumstance that springs immediately to mind.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 05:05 AM
  #45  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova,May 18 2010, 12:49 PM
Not sure what, other than a medical emergency.


Besides, any gains of that significance can be lost at traffic lights/roundabouts or other junctions once off the motorway - it's all pretty random and out of a driver's control really.
That covers quite a few situations from birth to death to organ donation and back again...

Before we even begin to look at others, such as matters of security

If that were the case then maybe we could all ignore blues and twos behind us?
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 05:24 AM
  #46  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Since when have blues and twos been subject to traffic lights and so on? In fact, that only serves to reinforce my argument.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 05:39 AM
  #47  
Heinz '57's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 70
From: Lincolnshire Wolds
Default

Originally Posted by Polemicist,May 18 2010, 02:01 PM
The central tenet of a fatuous argument is the only circumstance that springs immediately to mind.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 05:50 AM
  #48  
Rob88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,664
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Polemicist,May 18 2010, 01:01 PM
The central tenet of a fatuous argument is the only circumstance that springs immediately to mind.
from me too...
although it was water not coffee.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 05:54 AM
  #49  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova,May 18 2010, 01:24 PM
Since when have blues and twos been subject to traffic lights and so on? In fact, that only serves to reinforce my argument.
not all junctions are controlled by traffic lights

and not everyone involved in an emergency has the benefits of blues and twos

I thought you were saying that progress is largely out of the hands of drivers because of various restrictions

surely you are not?





Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 06:16 AM
  #50  
Rob88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,664
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,May 18 2010, 01:54 PM
and not everyone involved in an emergency has the benefits of blues and twos
Not sure about that.
Ambulances, Paramedics, even Basics docs do, emergency blood or organ transport vehicles do.


I can't actually think of anyone who's involved in an emergency who wouldn't have blues and twos, expect perhaps a community first responder or a surgeon rushing to a hospital, but they're not trained in that sort of driving anyway nor would they be expected to respond at speed.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 AM.