Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Brough Superior

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 12:48 PM
  #1  
Nick Brough's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
Default Brough Superior

Hi,

I mentioned in a thread about heaters in S2000's that I had a Brough Superior car. Someone kindly asked if I would post pictures here, so I have attached some of my 1935 Brough Superior 8 cylinder Drophead Coupe.

I have also added some of the launch of the New Brough Superior SS100 Bike on 5/12/2013 which I was invited to, and one of the Michelin Garage I came across on the way.





















Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 12:52 PM
  #2  
s2konroids's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 20,788
Likes: 8
From: location, location
Default

Wow.

Yup, i seen that they've been relaunched brough too.

Is it Brough, brough? lol
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 10:59 PM
  #3  
chrispayze's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 169
From: Bristol
Default

Wow, I'm not a bike fan, but that is stunning.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 11:46 PM
  #4  
RattyS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 0
From: bedfordshite
Default

Not knowing your personal history but any connection along the line?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 11:56 PM
  #5  
Nick Brough's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by chrispayze
Wow, I'm not a bike fan, but that is stunning.
I think they have captured the spirit of the original, they are expected to be around £42,000 which is an incredible price until compared to the astronomical £100,000 to £250,000 for an original.

Picture of an original bike


Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 03:32 AM
  #6  
PTR300's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire UK
Default

Brilliant !
A new Brough that looks like the old one, sort of, and yet has a load of modern bits too !

Like the car Nick, too... is it the 4 litre 8 pot?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 03:44 AM
  #7  
Daytona-Dave's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,908
Likes: 56
Default

Excellent, any pics of the (car) Engine Nick,
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 9, 2013 | 03:48 AM
  #8  
Nick Brough's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by PTR300
Brilliant !
A new Brough that looks like the old one, sort of, and yet has a load of modern bits too !

Like the car Nick, too... is it the 4 litre 8 pot?
Yes the 8 cylinder only did that model for a year then had to go to the 6 cylinder engine. Legend has it Railton, who used the same Hudson engine and chassis complained about them supplying a competitor, and being a bigger concern got their way.

It is believed they made around 25 8's of which around 14 survived maybe 9 or 10 on the road at the moment, then around 50 six's 4 saloons and 1 V12 so around 80 cars in total it is believed, all the records were lost in the war.

When asked how many cars he built George Brough used to claim 1000, that's George for you

Regards

Nick
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 04:10 AM
  #9  
Nick Brough's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Daytona-Dave
Excellent, any pics of the (car) Engine Nick,
Hi Ray,

Our son got married back in March and both families and friends hired a house near the wedding venue up near Buxton as a base for a couple of nights, managed to get a picture of the engine on the morning of the wedding.






The house we were staying in



engine in warmer times





Engine is a side valve, splash lubrication very simple straight eight just over 4 litres with incredible torque. three speed reverse gate box in top you can trickle along at 10mph and it will pull all the way up to 90 if you are brave with no problems.

It is recorded in the Rolls Royce archives that they got hold of an engine and took it apart as they could not believe how smooth it was. Having driven quite a few miles in a 1932 20/25 Rolls I understand why they did it. The engineering on the Rolls engine is far superior to the Hudson's, but in my opinion the Hudson engine is smoother.

Regards

Nick
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 06:17 AM
  #10  
martin j's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,433
Likes: 312
From: Dunfermline.
Default

I know about the bikes but didn't know that they also made cars, that is a stunning looking machine.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 PM.