Chalk and Cheese
Originally Posted by Mistress Quickly,Mar 26 2009, 02:53 PM
Sorry if rralston thinks my conversation is a bit daft and Moggy thinks that S2000 does not equal common sense or intelligence but I know that
Just found a vid of Dulcibella (What a lovely name!)
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/Dul...ry=Latest+Video
I like the feeling when the vehicle goes vroom too.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/Dul...ry=Latest+Video
I like the feeling when the vehicle goes vroom too.
Originally Posted by MarkB,Mar 26 2009, 03:04 PM
Rule number one of the internet - don't take it personally.
Especially as I know the two of them personally and one managed to run himself over with his own car, and the other has a penis the size of a cocktail sausage.

Especially as I know the two of them personally and one managed to run himself over with his own car, and the other has a penis the size of a cocktail sausage.

I think you've just got a big ar$e!
MQ - yep as Mark says - it's not personally addressed at you

The keepy uppy thing has been done, lots and lots and lots and lots!
Originally Posted by Mistress Quickly,Mar 26 2009, 02:53 PM
Posted because I was surprised that the Cayenne did not pull away up a straight incline where I often safely overtake. Was interested to know if you lot know if the mid-range performance of the Porsche does truly equate with that of the S2000.
Anyone who wants to have a play should do a test with my M5 - in the conditions you describe - accelerating up a slight incline
An S2000 would not be embarrassed - it would be annihilated
I've owned both - dragging is not the S2000's forte and it is no less a car for that
Originally Posted by Mistress Quickly,Mar 26 2009, 02:53 PM
Was interested to know if you lot know if the mid-range performance of the Porsche does truly equate with that of the S2000.
S2000
0-60 5.7s
0-100 14.33
60-100 8.66
Cayenne Turbo
0-60 5.6s
0-100 12.73s
60-100 6.57s
The standard Cayenne S is a lot slower than the S2000 mind.






