Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Chalk and Cheese

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #121  
MB's Avatar
MB
Member
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 33,838
Likes: 23
From: Sunshine Coast - England UK
Default

The 1/4 mile time Moggy?

Don't get too upset, I get told quoted figures for my Lotus are not achievable

Agree on the Clio - i'd love one!
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #122  
CiderBoy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8,070
Likes: 0
From: Brizzle
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi,Mar 28 2009, 11:24 AM
that's why it isn't any faster


The performance stats suggest that the E90 M3 is quicker than the E39 M5.

The M3 does 0-60 in 4.4 compared to 4.9 for the M5.
The M3 does 0-100 in 9.7 compared to 10.8 for the M5.
The M3 does 60-100 in 5.2 compared to 5.9 for the M5.

Originally Posted by gaddafi,Mar 28 2009, 11:24 AM
you also need to accept that the E39 is, by common consent, one of the top three or so handling/performing big saloons ever made
I agree it's up there at the top and it's a car I'd love to own... if I could stomach the running cost gamble!





Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 12:05 PM
  #123  
CiderBoy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8,070
Likes: 0
From: Brizzle
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova,Mar 28 2009, 05:22 PM
I'll try, see these.
You need to get out more Simon!

Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #124  
SteveFB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Default

had a 911 driver come up to me in the pits demanding to know what I had done to my S2000. It was stock. He thought his car was far superior to the S2000. He was wrong.

What model 911 did the demanding man drive?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 12:28 PM
  #125  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Originally Posted by SteveFB,Mar 28 2009, 08:22 PM
had a 911 driver come up to me in the pits demanding to know what I had done to my S2000. It was stock. He thought his car was far superior to the S2000. He was wrong.

What model 911 did the demanding man drive?
There are so many pointless variants, is this a new format for the National Lo'ery?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #126  
SteveFB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves,Mar 28 2009, 08:28 PM
There are so many pointless variants, is this a new format for the National Lo'ery?
Gobsh*te, I ####ed buying a 911, I'm coming home...........
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 01:05 PM
  #127  
Moggy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,541
Likes: 0
From: omnipresent
Default

Originally Posted by MB,Mar 28 2009, 07:57 PM
The 1/4 mile time Moggy?

Don't get too upset, I get told quoted figures for my Lotus are not achievable

Agree on the Clio - i'd love one!
All of it.

First one is incorrect, second one is incorrect because of the first, I don't know what the 3rd one is and the 4th I could walk quicker.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #128  
CiderBoy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 8,070
Likes: 0
From: Brizzle
Default

Originally Posted by SteveFB,Mar 28 2009, 08:22 PM
had a 911 driver come up to me in the pits demanding to know what I had done to my S2000. It was stock. He thought his car was far superior to the S2000. He was wrong.

What model 911 did the demanding man drive?
I don't know.

This is the actual car.

Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #129  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,292
Likes: 830
From: Nottingham
Default

Originally Posted by Moggy,Mar 28 2009, 09:05 PM
All of it.

First one is incorrect, second one is incorrect because of the first, I don't know what the 3rd one is and the 4th I could walk quicker.
feel free to quote something different
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #130  
Moggy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,541
Likes: 0
From: omnipresent
Default

Originally Posted by CiderBoy,Mar 28 2009, 08:01 PM


The performance stats suggest that the E90 M3 is quicker than the E39 M5.

The M3 does 0-60 in 4.4 compared to 4.9 for the M5.
The M3 does 0-100 in 9.7 compared to 10.8 for the M5.
The M3 does 60-100 in 5.2 compared to 5.9 for the M5.



I agree it's up there at the top and it's a car I'd love to own... if I could stomach the running cost gamble!

You are right about the E90M3 Vs E39M5 - New M3 has a bit of a weight advantage.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 AM.