Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Clio 197

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 06:46 AM
  #41  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

It would seem that way, wouldn't it?

There was a time when Citroens & Peugeots were capable of truly stellar mileages without major overhaul; but those were the days before the European steel crisis, when newer cars were suddenly rustier than older models. Plus they are designed to be wrapped round a poplar tree before any major work is required, means that servicing is frequently extremely awkward. In fact, the engine was often in the passenger cell before the poplar tree incident, as well as afterwards.

It amused me how people here used to sneer at italian cars, which were often statistically equivalent or better in dependability and were usually somewhat easier to work on.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 07:24 AM
  #42  
Polemicist's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves
It amused me how people here used to sneer at italian cars, which were often statistically equivalent or better in dependability and were usually somewhat easier to work on.
Not me. Ever. I'm a Italian car fanboi and ex-owner of;
Fiat 127
Fiat 126 #1
Fiat 127 Sport #1
Fiat Panda #1
Fiat 127 Palio
Fiat 126 #2
Fiat X1/9 #1
Fiat 127 Sport #2
Fiat Panda #2
Alfa Romeo 164
Fiat Multipla
Fiat X1/9 #2
Ferrari Mondial
Fiat X1/9 #3 Lido
Fiat Punto
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 08:30 AM
  #43  
Fatbloke's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 5
From: New Milton, Hants
Default

Originally Posted by Polemicist
Originally Posted by Nick Graves' timestamp='1343832408' post='21904780
It amused me how people here used to sneer at italian cars, which were often statistically equivalent or better in dependability and were usually somewhat easier to work on.
Not me. Ever. I'm a Italian car fanboi and ex-owner of;
Fiat 127
Fiat 126 #1
Fiat 127 Sport #1
Fiat Panda #1
Fiat 127 Palio
Fiat 126 #2
Fiat X1/9 #1
Fiat 127 Sport #2
Fiat Panda #2
Alfa Romeo 164
Fiat Multipla
Fiat X1/9 #2
Ferrari Mondial
Fiat X1/9 #3 Lido
Fiat Punto
I got burnt by the Italians in my early driving days with a Strada 105TC. Brilliant fun to drive, not only because of the performance and dynamics, but the fun games like 'what else will turn on when I press the light switch today', 'will the driver's door suddenly swing open again when I take the next corner' 'what gear is where 3rd used to be this time' and 'guess who's towing me home today'.

I've looked at many FIATs and Alfas since, but never had the bottle to buy again. Looking at owner reviews of more recent cars, it looks like they've got the reliability sorted, but maybe at the expense of the dynamics........
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 10:02 AM
  #44  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

They really shat on the dynamics with the Uno's torsion beam axle, wanky carburettors, etc and have been all at sea ever since. The engines were generally still really peppy, but the rest mediocre.

The reliability & CGAF dealers still mean bottom of the rankings with the French.

The Alfa Giulietta & Giulia look fantastic, but are supposedly set up imitating Audis. So uncomfortable & unreliable too, then. Again, I know some Alfisti who have had brilliant 147s & 156s. And then bad ones...

However; you are both right in that the italians shouldn't be quite so underbought & Audi & Reno not so overbought.

But when did perception & reality ever really align?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 10:33 AM
  #45  
gman1981's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Clio 182 Trophy is the only Clio to have. Extreamly sought after and hence keep their value well. I had one and forever regret selling it. Was a weapon on track, and never had any issues using it as my daily driver.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 02:19 PM
  #46  
Trailerparktrev's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Chichester
Default

Originally Posted by gman1981
Clio 182 Trophy is the only Clio to have. Extreamly sought after and hence keep their value well. I had one and forever regret selling it. Was a weapon on track, and never had any issues using it as my daily driver.

Give me Clio V6 255 over a Trophy any day of the week.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 02:43 PM
  #47  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 831
From: Nottingham
Default

Why?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 10:39 PM
  #48  
Trailerparktrev's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Chichester
Default

Originally Posted by Nottm_S2
Why?
The Trophy was just a 182 Cup in red paint, with a V6 spoiler and Sachs suspension that needs rebuilding after 40,000 miles.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 02:23 AM
  #49  
jml's Avatar
jml
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 35
From: Bruges
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves
It would seem that way, wouldn't it?

There was a time when Citroens & Peugeots were capable of truly stellar mileages without major overhaul; but those were the days before the European steel crisis, when newer cars were suddenly rustier than older models. Plus they are designed to be wrapped round a poplar tree before any major work is required, means that servicing is frequently extremely awkward. In fact, the engine was often in the passenger cell before the poplar tree incident, as well as afterwards.

It amused me how people here used to sneer at italian cars, which were often statistically equivalent or better in dependability and were usually somewhat easier to work on.
They all go for that assuring 'thunk' when they close the door nowadays.
Not that their cars are any better for that mind.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 03:05 AM
  #50  
Nezquick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Preston
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves
Originally Posted by Fatbloke' timestamp='1343413089' post='21894185
Didn't MINIs have Toyota engines for a while, Nick, or was that just the diesel?

I'd go with the Swift Sport - that's a good recommendation......
The R50 MINI did indeed have a Toyota Diseasel. The Petrols were from as Chrysler Neon.

The early R56 is the one where the problems started really badly; they replaced the old Chrysler engine with a development of the ancient PSA TU engine (104 anyone?) with valvetronic and the earlier bore/stroke/moving bits. The TC tensioner fails early on with disastrous consequences. HVAC units leak plus they have the usual FRED issues and other silly things. Bloody nightmares, some of them.

The Swift is far more Toyota-like, but without the boredom.
I have a R56 Cooper S and it's been plagued by problems. If it hadn't been for the dealer warranty it would have cost me a small fortune by now. Broken bonnet cable, pitted camshafts, TCT rattle (which resulted in the entire top end of the engine being replaced), turbo water cooler has needed replacing. In the 9 months i've owned it i've never needed to wash it as every time it goes back to BMW, they valet it for me

Why they ever used a dodgy old Peugeot engine i'll never know!

I'll never have another one and can't wait to get rid of the thing.

Saying that though, when it works, it's bloody good fun to drive!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 PM.