The Formula 1 Thread - 2012
No comments about Red Bull's approach to the rules?
Vettel has been given a 20 second penalty, demoting him to fifth (which puts Raikonnen third, and Kobayashi 4th). Which seemed likely according to the way the rules are, but I kind of feel that as long as the driver doesn't take an obvious shortcut (i.e. through a chicane) it should be okay to use bit off the tarmac like this whilst racing wheel to wheel. It is exciting to watch after all.
A bit of a disapointing end to the race, but great to see Button finding some form again after many were writing him off.
Vettel has been given a 20 second penalty, demoting him to fifth (which puts Raikonnen third, and Kobayashi 4th). Which seemed likely according to the way the rules are, but I kind of feel that as long as the driver doesn't take an obvious shortcut (i.e. through a chicane) it should be okay to use bit off the tarmac like this whilst racing wheel to wheel. It is exciting to watch after all.
A bit of a disapointing end to the race, but great to see Button finding some form again after many were writing him off.
Bring both back, enogh of this adapting/designing tracks to suit the cars.
I'm quite glad race circuits have friendlier run-off. As a keen amateur trackday person I'd much rather there was tarmac instead of gravel. I and most other users of circuits are going to make mistakes.
It's no just F1 that uses these circuits.
It was a bit rich Horner moaning about Hamilton not being sporting given the brouhaha over their new dodgy exhaust map.
It's no just F1 that uses these circuits.
It was a bit rich Horner moaning about Hamilton not being sporting given the brouhaha over their new dodgy exhaust map.
Red Bull both won and lost today on technicalities which would be karma if I believed in it:
Red Bull's engine maps were clearly within the letter of the law if not the intent.
Vettel's overtake was definitely not within the letter of the law even though it could be argued to be within the spirit: if he had remained within the racetrack (ie at least two wheels within the white lines) then it would have been ok. But to make the overtake, irrespective of the fact he was clearly faster than Button at that point, he had to leave the confines of the track. He should have backed out or given the place back according to the letter of the law. And the regs are pretty clear on not getting an advantage by leaving the track.
Red Bull's engine maps were clearly within the letter of the law if not the intent.
Vettel's overtake was definitely not within the letter of the law even though it could be argued to be within the spirit: if he had remained within the racetrack (ie at least two wheels within the white lines) then it would have been ok. But to make the overtake, irrespective of the fact he was clearly faster than Button at that point, he had to leave the confines of the track. He should have backed out or given the place back according to the letter of the law. And the regs are pretty clear on not getting an advantage by leaving the track.
Hmm you and I usually see eye to eye Dembo, but not sure I agree with that. I think it was correct to demote Vettel, my own personal feelings towards him to one side for a minute, if any driver during a race overtakes 'off' the track then they either give the place back (usually they do this immediately because they know the following will happen) or they get a drive through penalty 'approx 20+ seconds' this is exactly the result that should have happened, the stewards had no alternative, he should have given the place back, and then tried a re-overtake.
It's a contentious issue, and as Brundle said, in lower formula they don't worry about it so much. Think about La Source at Spa; I'm sure almost every race I've ever watched from there has half the field going wide on the first lap. Should they all get penalties, or is that the kind of exciting racing we want to see?
Originally Posted by s2k_Nut' timestamp='1342979509' post='21879826
Hmm you and I usually see eye to eye Dembo, but not sure I agree with that. I think it was correct to demote Vettel, my own personal feelings towards him to one side for a minute, if any driver during a race overtakes 'off' the track then they either give the place back (usually they do this immediately because they know the following will happen) or they get a drive through penalty 'approx 20+ seconds' this is exactly the result that should have happened, the stewards had no alternative, he should have given the place back, and then tried a re-overtake.
It's a contentious issue, and as Brundle said, in lower formula they don't worry about it so much. Think about La Source at Spa; I'm sure almost every race I've ever watched from there has half the field going wide on the first lap. Should they all get penalties, or is that the kind of exciting racing we want to see?
Your Spa example is about avoiding carnage rather than gaining an advantage I suspect.
If you can go wherever you want, then what's the point in having a fixed track in the first place.
Let's plant a few trees, place a few rocks off-line, then see if they do the same.
The line (ahem) has to be drawn somewhere.
How about a system where a driver goes down to 10% power if all 4 wheels leave the track? I am joking, but if the drivers don't respect the circuit, then that's where we're heading.
Let's plant a few trees, place a few rocks off-line, then see if they do the same.
The line (ahem) has to be drawn somewhere.
How about a system where a driver goes down to 10% power if all 4 wheels leave the track? I am joking, but if the drivers don't respect the circuit, then that's where we're heading.
Originally Posted by s2k_Nut' timestamp='1342979509' post='21879826
Hmm you and I usually see eye to eye Dembo, but not sure I agree with that. I think it was correct to demote Vettel, my own personal feelings towards him to one side for a minute, if any driver during a race overtakes 'off' the track then they either give the place back (usually they do this immediately because they know the following will happen) or they get a drive through penalty 'approx 20+ seconds' this is exactly the result that should have happened, the stewards had no alternative, he should have given the place back, and then tried a re-overtake.
It's a contentious issue, and as Brundle said, in lower formula they don't worry about it so much. Think about La Source at Spa; I'm sure almost every race I've ever watched from there has half the field going wide on the first lap. Should they all get penalties, or is that the kind of exciting racing we want to see?
IIRC in a recent race, this was likely to occur on the first lap, so a general directive was given that it was ok at that stage of a race.
If you can go wherever you want, then what's the point in having a fixed track in the first place.
Let's plant a few trees, place a few rocks off-line, then see if they do the same.
The line (ahem) has to be drawn somewhere.
How about a system where a driver goes down to 10% power if all 4 wheels leave the track? I am joking, but if the drivers don't respect the circuit, then that's where we're heading.
Let's plant a few trees, place a few rocks off-line, then see if they do the same.
The line (ahem) has to be drawn somewhere.
How about a system where a driver goes down to 10% power if all 4 wheels leave the track? I am joking, but if the drivers don't respect the circuit, then that's where we're heading.
They only use the run off as a part of the track because they have too much corner speed to stay legal.Any wheels off the track should be penalised.
Got to agree with that. If there was a likelyhood of damaging the car on a curb or being beached in a gravel trap you can be damned sure that they would stay on track.They manage it at Monaco
They only use the run off as a part of the track because they have too much corner speed to stay legal.
Any wheels off the track should be penalised.
They only use the run off as a part of the track because they have too much corner speed to stay legal.Any wheels off the track should be penalised.
Originally Posted by Heinz '57' timestamp='1343039413' post='21881191
Got to agree with that. If there was a likelyhood of damaging the car on a curb or being beached in a gravel trap you can be damned sure that they would stay on track.They manage it at Monaco
They only use the run off as a part of the track because they have too much corner speed to stay legal.
Any wheels off the track should be penalised.
They only use the run off as a part of the track because they have too much corner speed to stay legal.Any wheels off the track should be penalised.
Unless you agree that using the run off areas to overtake is ok? You also seem to have missed the fact that Monaco is somewhat narrow.






