Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

The Formula 1 Thread - 2013

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 06:30 AM
  #411  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default



The British GP in one photo
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 10:18 AM
  #412  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by Dembo
Originally Posted by fluffyninja' timestamp='1372765130' post='22642568
http://www.bbc.co.uk...rmula1/23141389

Tyres being changed for Germany
Yes I just read that. That strikes me as a bit crazy. If Friday and Saturday are wet, then the first time anybody is going to be able to use the new tyres properly is the first lap of the race.
I wonder if they are the same as the "development tyres" they've been using in FP1?
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 10:49 AM
  #413  
arsie's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,504
Likes: 241
From: Sunny Norf*ck
Default

A bit behind the crest of this story's wave but am I alone in thinking what a miracle of luck and skill there were no fatalities? And possibly I should add circuit design too (if not kerb construction )
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 11:01 AM
  #414  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 2
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

Originally Posted by arsie
A bit behind the crest of this story's wave but am I alone in thinking what a miracle of luck and skill there were no fatalities?
That's a bit of a hysterical over-reaction really. In reality, Massa was the only one who spun, everybody else was more than capable of keeping the car under control. The biggest danger was a big lump of tyre hitting another driver, but that would open happen if they weren't looking where they were going. Not wanting to suggest it wasn't serious, but at big, wide Silverstone the risk was quite small. Monaco on the other hand.

The saga continues...

Pirelli has blamed the way the Formula One teams used its tyres as the main cause of the blow outs it experienced at the British Grand Prix, citing tyres mounted the wrong way round, low pressures and extreme cambers as the reasons why the tyres suffered cuts from Silverstone's high kerbs. At the top of its statement Pirelli made clear: "The 2013 tyres do not compromise safety if used in the correct way".

The Italian tyre manufacturer said the rear tyres on the cars that suffered blow outs had been mounted with the right-hand tyre on the left-hand side and vice-a-versa. It said the asymmetrical structure of its tyres had not been designed to be used in this way and had put extra stress on the sidewalls where the cuts had appeared.
http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/motorsport/story/114195.html
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 11:19 AM
  #415  
arsie's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,504
Likes: 241
From: Sunny Norf*ck
Default

Originally Posted by Dembo
Originally Posted by arsie' timestamp='1372790954' post='22643450
A bit behind the crest of this story's wave but am I alone in thinking what a miracle of luck and skill there were no fatalities?
That's a bit of a hysterical over-reaction really. In reality, Massa was the only one who spun, everybody else was more than capable of keeping the car under control. The biggest danger was a big lump of tyre hitting another driver, but that would open happen if they weren't looking where they were going. Not wanting to suggest it wasn't serious, but at big, wide Silverstone the risk was quite small. Monaco on the other hand.

The saga continues...

Pirelli has blamed the way the Formula One teams used its tyres as the main cause of the blow outs it experienced at the British Grand Prix, citing tyres mounted the wrong way round, low pressures and extreme cambers as the reasons why the tyres suffered cuts from Silverstone's high kerbs. At the top of its statement Pirelli made clear: "The 2013 tyres do not compromise safety if used in the correct way".

The Italian tyre manufacturer said the rear tyres on the cars that suffered blow outs had been mounted with the right-hand tyre on the left-hand side and vice-a-versa. It said the asymmetrical structure of its tyres had not been designed to be used in this way and had put extra stress on the sidewalls where the cuts had appeared.
http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/motorsport/story/114195.html
Big open wide - yes, that's what I was referring to by 'circuit design', which words you omitted - allied with driver skill, meant none of the exploding tyres resulted in an out-of-control suddenly 3 wheeled car smacking into another one at the high speeds that characterise Silverstone. So avoiding injury and/or fatality we had reason to be thankful for in the cold clear light of day. Not an over reaction by me - and certainly not hysterical.

But returning to the plot, it sounds weird that many teams would recklessly - in Pirelli's eyes - swap tyres round unless they had reasons (a) to do so and (b) to ignore the manufacturer's guidance. Now that is beginning to sound funny. Maybe there has been an undercurrent of friction between teams and Pirelli - or am I being hysterical again
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #416  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Originally Posted by arsie
Originally Posted by Dembo' timestamp='1372791702' post='22643494
[quote name='arsie' timestamp='1372790954' post='22643450']
A bit behind the crest of this story's wave but am I alone in thinking what a miracle of luck and skill there were no fatalities?
That's a bit of a hysterical over-reaction really. In reality, Massa was the only one who spun, everybody else was more than capable of keeping the car under control. The biggest danger was a big lump of tyre hitting another driver, but that would open happen if they weren't looking where they were going. Not wanting to suggest it wasn't serious, but at big, wide Silverstone the risk was quite small. Monaco on the other hand.

The saga continues...

Pirelli has blamed the way the Formula One teams used its tyres as the main cause of the blow outs it experienced at the British Grand Prix, citing tyres mounted the wrong way round, low pressures and extreme cambers as the reasons why the tyres suffered cuts from Silverstone's high kerbs. At the top of its statement Pirelli made clear: "The 2013 tyres do not compromise safety if used in the correct way".

The Italian tyre manufacturer said the rear tyres on the cars that suffered blow outs had been mounted with the right-hand tyre on the left-hand side and vice-a-versa. It said the asymmetrical structure of its tyres had not been designed to be used in this way and had put extra stress on the sidewalls where the cuts had appeared.
http://www.espn.co.u...ory/114195.html
Big open wide - yes, that's what I was referring to by 'circuit design', which words you omitted - allied with driver skill, meant none of the exploding tyres resulted in an out-of-control suddenly 3 wheeled car smacking into another one at the high speeds that characterise Silverstone. So avoiding injury and/or fatality we had reason to be thankful for in the cold clear light of day. Not an over reaction by me - and certainly not hysterical.

But returning to the plot, it sounds weird that many teams would recklessly - in Pirelli's eyes - swap tyres round unless they had reasons (a) to do so and (b) to ignore the manufacturer's guidance. Now that is beginning to sound funny. Maybe there has been an undercurrent of friction between teams and Pirelli - or am I being hysterical again
[/quote]

I agree, it was pretty damn fortunate nobody was killed, not sure I get your point regarding Pirelli, unless you mean the friction that Red Bull would have with them for not sticking with last years tyres so they had all the aces again this year ... not that it is making that much difference, someone needs to send Adrian Newey a new task away from F1, what a fekin genius he is.
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 02:29 PM
  #417  
arsie's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,504
Likes: 241
From: Sunny Norf*ck
Default

Originally Posted by s2k_Nut
Originally Posted by arsie' timestamp='1372792781' post='22643545
[quote name='Dembo' timestamp='1372791702' post='22643494']
Pirelli has blamed the way the Formula One teams used its tyres as the main cause of the blow outs it experienced at the British Grand Prix, citing tyres mounted the wrong way round, low pressures and extreme cambers as the reasons why the tyres suffered cuts from Silverstone's high kerbs. At the top of its statement Pirelli made clear: "The 2013 tyres do not compromise safety if used in the correct way".

The Italian tyre manufacturer said the rear tyres on the cars that suffered blow outs had been mounted with the right-hand tyre on the left-hand side and vice-a-versa. It said the asymmetrical structure of its tyres had not been designed to be used in this way and had put extra stress on the sidewalls where the cuts had appeared.

http://www.espn.co.u...ory/114195.html
... it sounds weird that many teams would recklessly - in Pirelli's eyes - swap tyres round unless they had reasons (a) to do so and (b) to ignore the manufacturer's guidance. Maybe there has been an undercurrent of friction between teams and Pirelli.
... not sure I get your point regarding Pirelli, unless you mean the friction that Red Bull would have with them for not sticking with last years tyres so they had all the aces again this year ... not that it is making that much difference, someone needs to send Adrian Newey a new task away from F1, what a fekin genius he is.
[/quote]
I was speculating that, based on what Dembo linked to, maybe there is some 'We Know Best' arm wrestling going on behind the scenes if Pirelli feel thay have to belittle teams in public for putting tyres on the wrong way round, using undue camber, running very low pressures etc I doubt very much teams would put tyres on 'the wrong way round' by accident.
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 12:22 AM
  #418  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Originally Posted by arsie
Originally Posted by s2k_Nut' timestamp='1372802446' post='22643990
[quote name='arsie' timestamp='1372792781' post='22643545']
[quote name='Dembo' timestamp='1372791702' post='22643494']
Pirelli has blamed the way the Formula One teams used its tyres as the main cause of the blow outs it experienced at the British Grand Prix, citing tyres mounted the wrong way round, low pressures and extreme cambers as the reasons why the tyres suffered cuts from Silverstone's high kerbs. At the top of its statement Pirelli made clear: "The 2013 tyres do not compromise safety if used in the correct way".

The Italian tyre manufacturer said the rear tyres on the cars that suffered blow outs had been mounted with the right-hand tyre on the left-hand side and vice-a-versa. It said the asymmetrical structure of its tyres had not been designed to be used in this way and had put extra stress on the sidewalls where the cuts had appeared.

http://www.espn.co.u...ory/114195.html
... it sounds weird that many teams would recklessly - in Pirelli's eyes - swap tyres round unless they had reasons (a) to do so and (b) to ignore the manufacturer's guidance. Maybe there has been an undercurrent of friction between teams and Pirelli.
... not sure I get your point regarding Pirelli, unless you mean the friction that Red Bull would have with them for not sticking with last years tyres so they had all the aces again this year ... not that it is making that much difference, someone needs to send Adrian Newey a new task away from F1, what a fekin genius he is.
[/quote]
I was speculating that, based on what Dembo linked to, maybe there is some 'We Know Best' arm wrestling going on behind the scenes if Pirelli feel thay have to belittle teams in public for putting tyres on the wrong way round, using undue camber, running very low pressures etc I doubt very much teams would put tyres on 'the wrong way round' by accident.
[/quote]

Yeah your view makes sense, I should have read the link Dembo posted before commenting, what Pirelli wrote would make a lot of sense regarding the blow-outs for sure.
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 01:14 AM
  #419  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by arsie
I was speculating that, based on what Dembo linked to, maybe there is some 'We Know Best' arm wrestling going on behind the scenes if Pirelli feel thay have to belittle teams in public for putting tyres on the wrong way round, using undue camber, running very low pressures etc I doubt very much teams would put tyres on 'the wrong way round' by accident.
True, and don't forget the problems that Red Bull had at Spa a few years back which were mostly due to them running more front camber than recommended by Pirelli.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/94115
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 01:27 AM
  #420  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 2
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

Originally Posted by arsie
I was speculating that, based on what Dembo linked to, maybe there is some 'We Know Best' arm wrestling going on behind the scenes if Pirelli feel thay have to belittle teams in public for putting tyres on the wrong way round, using undue camber, running very low pressures etc I doubt very much teams would put tyres on 'the wrong way round' by accident.
Of course Pirelli would have known that the teams were using the tyres backwards, and the cambers and pressures they were using, because they analyze all the tyres. So it doesn't really absolve them of any blame. If they thought it was an issue, they could have said something.

But it shows nothing is black and white. It's not as simple as the tyres aren't "safe". It's interesting that after the first failures, Red Bull at least increased the pressure in their tyres. So clearly they knew that running with lower pressures represented a risk but chose to continue doing so whilst publicly criticising Pirelli, much like they did with the front camber in Spa.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 AM.