Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

The Next Logical Step?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 03:13 AM
  #51  
jml's Avatar
jml
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 35
From: Bruges
Default

Originally Posted by S2KIP
Not only powerful enough but they are very slippy aerodynamics wise. My 420 bhp+ Evo IX could not keep up with my mates 370 bhp 997 at any speed, especially over 60. I went out as a passenger in it and the torque surge is a lot more than you think for an NA motor!

Some say the turbo takes the enjoyment out of the way 911's drive.
Never felt the need for a turbo.

Bit fragile though :

Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 03:19 AM
  #52  
Starlight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
From: Bristol
Default

I would still consider the Cayman a relatively rare car, not huge numbers sold. I see less on the road than I do S2000's, but then I guess it just depends on the area you live and commute / work that will determine an apparent rarity due to see other specific car types.

Boxters are far more prolific than Caymans.

I would suggest a warranty with a Porka just as a safety net, or put money aside. Had a few minor bits done under warranty on the first one, but nothing serious and not had any issues with the engines either. Admittedly the first one only did approximately 37000 miles in 7 and half years

Anyway I am biased in that choice
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 04:26 AM
  #53  
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,330
Likes: 0
From: Frustration
Default

The S is irreplaceable IMHO.

I've driven loads of things, many mentioned in this list.

Not one of them can offer what an S2000 does.

For me, it has the right blend of everything. You might call it a jack of all trades, but that just proves how useable it is!

I don't think I'd ever spend today's equivalent of £20k on a car. Well never say never, but I just can't see how spending that type of wedge is going to get you more of a thrill than something costing <£10k. I don't class super nutter cars in this, nor cars bought as investments BTW.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 04:53 AM
  #54  
lower's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,652
Likes: 17
From: Market Harborough, Leics.
Default

If you want a Z4M coupe, buy one now. Prices are steadily going up, which i find incredible for a used car.

I've had mine for 3 years and do really like it. However, i'm getting itchy feet but I don't know what to get after the Z4M.....and what's making it worse is its value keeps going up.

At the moment they are selling for not far off what i paid for it 3 years ago and i've put 30k miles on it in my ownership.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 09:48 AM
  #55  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

Originally Posted by Ultra_Nexus
The S is irreplaceable IMHO.

I've driven loads of things, many mentioned in this list.

Not one of them can offer what an S2000 does.

For me, it has the right blend of everything. You might call it a jack of all trades, but that just proves how useable it is!

I don't think I'd ever spend today's equivalent of £20k on a car. Well never say never, but I just can't see how spending that type of wedge is going to get you more of a thrill than something costing <£10k. I don't class super nutter cars in this, nor cars bought as investments BTW.
You can buy a Boxster S for well under £10K and it is a better car than the S2000 in every respect. Some might say it should be, I only state it because I own both and it's a fact. Whether it was a fair comparison when the cars were new is moot, £9K S versus £9K Boxster is a walkover for the Porsche.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 10:41 AM
  #56  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,296
Likes: 830
From: Nottingham
Default

assuming you have deep pockets. in terms of cost of ownership i doubt they'd be close.

I say that because having owned my S since 2002 i've replaced a wheel bearing, other than that it's been service, consumables (discs and pads) and nowt else

it's cheaper to run than our Golf GTD bar the fuel
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 11:39 AM
  #57  
S2KIP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi
You can buy a Boxster S for well under £10K and it is a better car than the S2000 in every respect. Some might say it should be, I only state it because I own both and it's a fact. Whether it was a fair comparison when the cars were new is moot, £9K S versus £9K Boxster is a walkover for the Porsche.
I test drove a 2006 Boxster S and to be honest I thought it was okay, couldn't justify spending an extra £10k on it to replace the S2000 as I just seem to have more fun in the Honda.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 11:43 AM
  #58  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Probably why Gad has both; the S2000 and NSX are good at different things, too.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 12:02 PM
  #59  
ade73's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 18
From: Hell on toast
Default

NSX is the next step from an S2000
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 12:20 PM
  #60  
jml's Avatar
jml
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 35
From: Bruges
Default

For me Porsche has always meant 911
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 AM.