The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

Bush Steps in to aid in Hurricane Katrina.

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #131  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

See my semi rant in the I'm thread.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 12:35 PM
  #132  
s2000qtee's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,963
Likes: 0
From: N to the Y to the C
Default

LOOK:



Despite Warnings, Washington Failed to Fund Levee Projects
By Richard A. Serrano and Nicole Gaouette Times Staff Writers
Sun Sep 4, 7:55 AM ET



WASHINGTON
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #133  
zdave87's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

[QUOTE=s2000qtee,Sep 4 2005, 04:35 PM] LOOK:



Despite Warnings, Washington Failed to Fund Levee Projects
By Richard A. Serrano and Nicole Gaouette Times Staff Writers
Sun Sep 4, 7:55 AM ET



WASHINGTON
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #134  
s2000qtee's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,963
Likes: 0
From: N to the Y to the C
Default

Well, if it was something brought up several times to Washington, and they did nothing about it, yes it CAN be blamed on the Feds.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 12:51 PM
  #135  
RichUK's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,694
Likes: 1
From: Oxfordshire
Default

But am I right in thinking that the Federal government cannot intervene in State matters?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #136  
zdave87's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

Originally Posted by s2000qtee,Sep 4 2005, 04:48 PM
Well, if it was something brought up several times to Washington, and they did nothing about it, yes it CAN be blamed on the Feds.
This the whole point of my arguement--if LA decided that the levees were in danger of failing as a result of a potential hurricane-----why did LA not take the matters into their own hands and correct the problems? If it mean't taxing the NO residents $100, $500, $1000 per person--why the hell didn't they do it?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #137  
s2000qtee's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,963
Likes: 0
From: N to the Y to the C
Default

Because taxing NO resididents is retarted......the article continues to talk about how NO made a plea to Washington for $500million when Bush came into office.......4.5 years later.....
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #138  
s2000qtee's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,963
Likes: 0
From: N to the Y to the C
Default

http://news.yahoo.com/s/latimests/20050904...ndleveeprojects


thats the entire article
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #139  
jedwards's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

Originally Posted by zdave87,Sep 4 2005, 01:43 PM
Sophia


This is something that can't be blamed on the President. It all comes down to the local mayor/councilpeople/governor etc.

What I mean is that the Fed Gov't cannot be blamed for every single disaster that comes along.

Did the Mayor of New Orleans run on a platform that said that the levees have to be fixed? NO.

Did the governor? NO.

Did any of the elected officials in the parish run on that issue? NO.
The senate from LA and at least past Governors (I don't know about this one) have railed on this issue for decades Dave.

The Fed gov has committed to help again and again and then revoked the allocated funding.

They are responsible. Sadly many Americans will let the bastards off. The govt will deny their responsibility and thank other politicians for hard work. Then those politicians will agree there was no responsiblity and thank other politicians. We're being punked.

Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 01:45 PM
  #140  
jedwards's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

Originally Posted by RichUK,Sep 4 2005, 01:51 PM
But am I right in thinking that the Federal government cannot intervene in State matters?
The difficulty is "what is a state matter". The constitution (and it's amendments say virtually everything. (And that almost nothing is a Fed Matter). In practice the Feds move into nearly everything and then back away from those responsibilities when it suits there sorry asses.

Americans pay more to Feds that to State in taxes. It's up the the Feds to step up with those bucks. Otherwise they are being misappropriated.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 AM.