The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

Bush Steps in to aid in Hurricane Katrina.

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #141  
jedwards's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

Day of reckoning must come for Katrina's victims

PUBLISHED: September 4, 2005

Chad Selweski
Columnist

I don't know who's to blame for the chaos and incompetence of the post-Katrina relief effort in New Orleans, but I do know this: There must be a day of reckoning.

Clearly, numerous government agencies and officials -- from the president to the police chief -- failed the city that may never again be known as The Big Easy. Mistakes were made in the years leading up to the hurricane, in the hours before Katrina slammed the Crescent City and, certainly, in the days after the storm.

The suffering was heartbreaking to see. But the resulting inaction and anarchy was too maddening to comprehend.

This was a national disgrace.

For all the world to see, the United States took on the appearance of a Third World country. A stumbling, bumbling giant. A supposed superpower that can't cope with a natural disaster in its own back yard.

Across the globe, our allies seemed dismayed at our inabilities. Our enemies gleefully pointed out our deficiencies.

Americans were stunned that thousands of people were left for dead, living on flooded streets without food or water. Starving refugees on American soil -- how can that be?

Worse, the looting and lawlessness left a second black mark on America. The marauding gangs became such a threat that heavily-armed National Guard troops were given shoot-to-kill instructions. Incredibly, vehicles evacuating the sick from a hospital were fired upon by thugs.

Imagine how many Americans, after listening to pleas for charitable help, would have turned up their noses at the Asian tsunami victims, dismissing them as savages, if such violence erupted in Indonesia following that disaster.

This was a humbling experience.

In Katrina's immediate aftermath, commentators on the left and the right offered their instant idiotic analysis. The liberals said global warming caused the hurricane, and the cost of the Iraq war led to levee breaks. The conservatives said government corruption in Louisiana and New Orleans prompted the non-response, and the low-lying city never should have been built in the first place.

Setting aside the spin, there's obviously a lot of blame to go around.

I'm sure Americans of every stripe have a lot of questions:

* Why couldn't we airdrop food and water, just as we do for disaster victims across the globe? Why did it take four days for the National Guard to arrive in force and why couldn't we provide more buses and other means of quick evacuation?

* Was the Army Corps of Engineers shortchanged on funding for years in its attempt to shore up the levees, which were widely known to be incapable of handling a major hurricane?

* How much of an effect did the Iraq war have on the National Guard response, and why was more than half of the Louisiana Guard not on duty when the hurricane hit?

* Did large segments of the New Orleans police force abandon their posts in the Katrina aftermath?

* How many residents chose to stay, and how many had to stay?

* Why didn't black leaders -- Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton -- visit the area and speak out against the looting and shooting?

* How is it possible that Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff was unaware of the abysmal conditions at the convention center even after widespread media reports?

* Has the Federal Emergency Management Agency's role been lost in the DHS' bureaucratic labyrinth, or has it been supplanted by a greater emphasis on anti-terrorism?

* Why was FEMA's lack of planning, its lack of command and control, so great that basic needs like generators and sandbags to protect the city's water pumps went unheeded?

The Bush-bashing has gone overboard, but the president faced one of the greatest disasters in U.S. history and in that moment he was supposed to provide leadership, to act as healer-in-chief. His lack of leadership -- a tepid speech Thursday and a visit to the storm-ravaged areas four days later -- almost suggested complacency.

In time, after the suffering has ended, we must have a national moment to pause and reflect.

Surely there are lessons to be learned in all of this. And those lessons must be heeded. We owe that to the memory of those who died needlessly.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #142  
NikePenguin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 38,617
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by s2000qtee,Sep 4 2005, 01:48 PM
Well, if it was something brought up several times to Washington, and they did nothing about it, yes it CAN be blamed on the Feds.
No it can't. It is, was, and will always be a local issue. Yes they have every right to request federal funds. But remember, there are 50 states in this union. They all want federal funds.

If LA knew it was such a big issue, why didn't they do anything more than beg for federal money?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #143  
NikePenguin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 38,617
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by s2000qtee,Sep 4 2005, 02:20 PM
Because taxing NO resididents is retarted......the article continues to talk about how NO made a plea to Washington for $500million when Bush came into office.......4.5 years later.....
Taxing those who directly benefit would be ideal.

New Orleans had a population of about 500K? That is $1000/person. Now that they have lost everything, don't you think they should have paid the $1000/person themselves?

New Orleans has been below sea level for more than 4.5 years. The danger of the Mississippi flooding and of hurricanes has been known for much longer too. Blame the arrogance of humans to think they can fight off nature. Blame the city for not making it a higher priority for themselves.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #144  
NikePenguin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 38,617
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jedwards,Sep 4 2005, 02:41 PM
The senate from LA and at least past Governors (I don't know about this one) have railed on this issue for decades Dave.

The Fed gov has committed to help again and again and then revoked the allocated funding.

They are responsible. Sadly many Americans will let the bastards off. The govt will deny their responsibility and thank other politicians for hard work. Then those politicians will agree there was no responsiblity and thank other politicians. We're being punked.

Sadly, most Americans believe someone else should protect them and look after them. The government can never protect its citizens from everything. Citizens need to take more responsibility in protecting themselves.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #145  
NikePenguin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 38,617
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jedwards,Sep 4 2005, 02:45 PM
The difficulty is "what is a state matter". The constitution (and it's amendments say virtually everything. (And that almost nothing is a Fed Matter). In practice the Feds move into nearly everything and then back away from those responsibilities when it suits there sorry asses.

Americans pay more to Feds that to State in taxes. It's up the the Feds to step up with those bucks. Otherwise they are being misappropriated.
I'm sure you know why the Consitution gives most rights to the States. And I am sure you know why today, the federal government has more power than the states.

Californians pay more to the federal government than the state receives back each year. One could make a strong argument that that is misappropriation.

Seems like federal spending is like gas prices. Everyone likes to bitch and moan about it, but in the end no one really cares enough to do anything about it. We continue to let our politicians ignore our wishes and we continue to buy cars with very little consideration of fuel efficiency.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #146  
s2000qtee's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,963
Likes: 0
From: N to the Y to the C
Default

Originally Posted by NikePenguin,Sep 4 2005, 09:07 PM
Sadly, most Americans believe someone else should protect them and look after them. The government can never protect its citizens from everything. Citizens need to take more responsibility in protecting themselves.
If the federal government cannot save people from dying in a slow-moving flood within 4 days, then what are they there for?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 03:22 AM
  #147  
zdave87's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

Originally Posted by s2000qtee,Sep 5 2005, 12:41 AM
If the federal government cannot save people from dying in a slow-moving flood within 4 days, then what are they there for?
If people can't walk out from a slow moving flood in four days, are they worth saving?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 06:30 AM
  #148  
s2000qtee's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,963
Likes: 0
From: N to the Y to the C
Default

What about the people in the Superdome who died? People in nursing homes? People already in the hospitals? People who were victims of crazy looters? People who died on the streets trying to get out? People who died from lack of water, heat and lack of medication?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 06:32 AM
  #149  
s2000qtee's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,963
Likes: 0
From: N to the Y to the C
Default

This is a general question for anyone who knows the answer: why is there paperwork necessary to be filled out and sent back to Washington before any state can release their National Guard to help neighboring states?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 09:53 AM
  #150  
jedwards's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

Originally Posted by NikePenguin,Sep 4 2005, 05:56 PM
No it can't. It is, was, and will always be a local issue. Yes they have every right to request federal funds. But remember, there are 50 states in this union. They all want federal funds.

If LA knew it was such a big issue, why didn't they do anything more than beg for federal money?
NP it can. The levees are and have always been a federal responsibility. They were built by and are maintained by the Army Corps of Engineers.

Once again... GW allocated funds for their improvement and then withdrew those funds.

Neither the State nor the City could improve on the levee system even if it wanted to. As for the total lack of security in NO after the disaster, this was a failing of the Homeland Security.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 AM.