The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

The debate for dummies

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #311  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

If using a nuclear weapon in the Middle East would eliminate the threat of global terrorism, would it be worth it?

Note: This is a theorhetical example, I'm not in any way, shape or form saying that this is what I believe or that it is a reasonable assumption. Just a question to bound the issue of what steps might or might not be reasonable in this new era of war.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #312  
jedwards's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

Mmmmm bacon and sex.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #313  
jedwards's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

Reminds me of several "perfect date" jokes.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #314  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

Another theorhetical question:

If you had to choose between sex and bacon which would you choose?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:12 AM
  #315  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

Saddam Hussein or Martha Stewart...who's the greater threat to society?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:14 AM
  #316  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

The other serious political discussion that came up last night was the idea of bringing peace/stability to other nations around the world while we still have poverty, unemployemnt, starvation and lack of education in our own country.

Should we focus all of our energy within our border or should we continue to help others rise up as we raise ourselves up? If we should continue to help others, what's the proper balance?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:20 AM
  #317  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by brantshali,Oct 7 2004, 02:14 PM
The other serious political discussion that came up last night was the idea of bringing peace/stability to other nations around the world while we still have poverty, unemployemnt, starvation and lack of education in our own country.

Should we focus all of our energy within our border or should we continue to help others rise up as we raise ourselves up? If we should continue to help others, what's the proper balance?
I firmly believe we have the resources to accomplish both, though not the focus.

I suppose this is my socialist side speaking, but our government has too many people who are more concerned with how the top 1% is doing and not enough concerned with how the bottom 1% is doing.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:21 AM
  #318  
jedwards's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

What a neat question. I was ready with one answer and then another.. now I'm not sure.

I made a statement the other day (not here) that while Saddam was in power there was a lot of suffering and misery in Iraq but the rest of the world was safer than it is now. I stand by that.

Martha Stewart? I think she's an example of a great threat to our society though not the most extreme. Ken Lay, Bernie Ebbers, and Dennis Kozlowski are responsible for the loss (to real people) of $3 billion of share values. The threat is greed and lack of ethics and values.

If you live your life as a values based citizen but fight for your survival using any tactic available... is that a contradiction? I'm thinking about that.

As for being under the constant watchful eye 24/7... we're pretty much there.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:22 AM
  #319  
jedwards's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

Originally Posted by brantshali,Oct 7 2004, 12:11 PM
Another theorhetical question:

If you had to choose between sex and bacon which would you choose?
Would I be able to eat bacon twice a day? Would I stop wanting bacon when I get old?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 11:23 AM
  #320  
jedwards's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28,318
Likes: 9
From: This is not my house!
Default

Originally Posted by WestSideBilly,Oct 7 2004, 12:20 PM
I firmly believe we have the resources to accomplish both, though not the focus.

I suppose this is my socialist side speaking, but our government has too many people who are more concerned with how the top 1% is doing and not enough concerned with how the bottom 1% is doing.
Sure we have the resources but they're unevenly distributed. What you think it should be shared? Pinko!


Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 AM.