Dragon Events Tail of the Dragon (Highway US129) 318 curves in 11 miles, is America’s number one motorcycle and sports car road.

Dear Ron...

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 19, 2009 | 04:26 PM
  #101  
Scooterboy's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 30,658
Likes: 4,705
From: Medina, OH
Default

Notice he said "she".
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2009 | 05:55 PM
  #102  
triman54's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,040
Likes: 0
From: Winter Springs, Fl.
Default

Originally Posted by Ron,Aug 19 2009, 04:19 PM
You produce the logical paradox of our perception of omnipotence. However, an omnipotent being would not be limited by anything, including logic. So attempting a formal proof based on our limited understanding is futile.

Obviously, the same applies to your mathematically based framing of the same question.

An omnipotent being could produce a rock so heavy she could not lift it, and then lift it.
This is the classic response to the paradox. But the problem with this response is that you reformulate the syllogism by introducing a different varible, i.e, an alleged lack of understanding. It is a closed syllogism.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2009 | 06:06 PM
  #103  
Lovetodrive2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 35,982
Likes: 211
From: 262 miles N of the Dragon
Default

Originally Posted by Ron,Aug 19 2009, 08:19 PM
You produce the logical paradox of our perception of omnipotence. However, an omnipotent being would not be limited by anything, including logic. So attempting a formal proof based on our limited understanding is futile.

Obviously, the same applies to your mathematically based framing of the same question.

An omnipotent being could produce a rock so heavy she could not lift it, and then lift it.
This is getting way to deep for me!
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #104  
Lovetodrive2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 35,982
Likes: 211
From: 262 miles N of the Dragon
Default

Originally Posted by triman54,Aug 19 2009, 09:55 PM
This is the classic response to the paradox. But the problem with this response is that you reformulate the syllogism by introducing a different varible, i.e, an alleged lack of understanding. It is a closed syllogism.
Again..... this is way to deep for me!

I'm a simple person.... Give me a S2000 and a curvy road and I am happy!
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:47 AM
  #105  
triman54's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,040
Likes: 0
From: Winter Springs, Fl.
Default

Originally Posted by Lovetodrive2000,Aug 19 2009, 06:07 PM
Again..... this is way to deep for me!

I'm a simple person.... Give me a S2000 and a curvy road and I am happy!
And a beer and a bear!
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 02:36 AM
  #106  
Ron's Avatar
Ron
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Default

Originally Posted by triman54,Aug 19 2009, 08:55 PM
This is the classic response to the paradox. But the problem with this response is that you reformulate the syllogism by introducing a different varible, i.e, an alleged lack of understanding. It is a closed syllogism.
I don't think you can call this the "classic" respond. There have been many responses to the paradox from biblical apologist to proof of the impossibility of omnipotence.

At any rate, you misunderstand my response. Any lack of understanding on our part is immaterial. Saying that logic would be an impediment to an omnipotent being is just one more "unliftable rock." To be omnipotent is to be unlimited by anything, including logic so a syllogism cannot apply.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 02:53 AM
  #107  
Ron's Avatar
Ron
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Default

Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 03:33 AM
  #108  
Lovetodrive2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 35,982
Likes: 211
From: 262 miles N of the Dragon
Default

Dear Ron:

At a movie theater which arm rest is mine?

I don't mean who owns it... but which one am I allowed to use?

Thanks in advance.

Signed,
Holding elbows up in Cincy!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 03:35 AM
  #109  
Lovetodrive2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 35,982
Likes: 211
From: 262 miles N of the Dragon
Default

Dear Ron:

Another question that keeps me up at night....

How far east can you go before you're heading west?

Signed,
Directionally challenged in Cincy!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 04:27 AM
  #110  
Ron's Avatar
Ron
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Default

Originally Posted by Lovetodrive2000,Aug 23 2009, 06:33 AM
Dear Ron:

At a movie theater which arm rest is mine?

I don't mean who owns it... but which one am I allowed to use?

Thanks in advance.

Signed,
Holding elbows up in Cincy!
These is no one answer to this question and often, it is like the drivers ed teacher tells you about a four-way stop sign intersection, a matter of common courtesy. However, here are some guidelines.

If you have an empty chair on one side, and your seatmate on the other side does not, use your uncontested armrest to a allow them an uncontested arm. If you both have open chairs on the other side, tend to alternate unless it becomes clear your seatmate prefers her uncontested side.

When on a full aisle, remember that 90+ percent of people are right handed and will tend to use their right-hand armrest. You should do the same. Left-handers should remember that "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one."

If you wind up beside an ambidextrous seatmate who is trying to have it both ways, take advantage of the unguarded section of the armrest. Even if your seatmate has their entire forearm resting on the armrest, there will sometimes be a couple of square inches open or they will shift at some point to provide that small opening. Plant your elbow in that beachhead and then just concentrate on gaining ground with each small move of your opponent's arm. In a surprisingly short time, you'll have at least half of the armrest to yourself and, often, the entire rest as your clever tactics cause complete capitulation and withdrawal from the field of battle.

Thus are heroes made in these lesser days.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 PM.