Stroker kits

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Feb 28, 2006 | 07:23 PM

#61

suterusu

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 838

Likes: 5

From: MI

Quote:

Originally Posted by S2000_Europe,Feb 27 2006, 04:31 PM

99 mm crank and 90 mm bore

ummm, have you seen the space between cylinders, even with the stock 87mm bore? This is going to come off sounding like I'm an asshole, but I think the 2.5L stroker is a pretty stupid idea. I'm not sure what they were thinking when they came up with it besides bragging rights.

Even with a closed deck (I'm not sure if the IP is or not) you are taking what little meat there is left between the cylinders down, and on top of that adding a huge amount of side loading on the thin walls with that 99mm stroke. Just stupid and for bragging rights.

Thats one thing that turns me off from the 100mm 2.4L stroker. There is a large amount of stress on the "power" side of the cylinder in an engine that was designed to have very little stress in that direction. If I were to ever do it, I'd probably go with the ERL SuperDeck and stock sized bore because you'll need all the strength you can get. I'm anxious to see how the ASM 2.4L engine continues to fair under race use.

EDIT: Just went and measured, the spacing between the cylinders is ~7.5mm, so boring it out to 90mm takes 1.5mm off each side leaving you with ~4.5mm seperating each cylinder. That's just nuts.

Feb 28, 2006 | 07:43 PM

#62

suterusu

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 838

Likes: 5

From: MI

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip,Feb 27 2006, 05:14 PM

Bore = 87mm
Stroke = 92mm

((3.142 x ( (bore/2) x (bore/2) ) x Stroke) x 4 cylinders) / 1000
((3.142 x (43.5 x 43.5) x 92) x 4 ) / 1000
(3.142 x 1892.25 x 92 x 4) /1000
2187925.416 / 1000

2187.92CC

sorry to nitpick, but the F22C has a 90.7mm stroke, not 92. Bore is the same as the F20C at 87mm. So, the displacement is 2156cc.

Feb 28, 2006 | 11:24 PM

#63

Trip

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 1,245

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by suterusu,Mar 1 2006, 06:43 AM

sorry to nitpick, but the F22C has a 90.7mm stroke, not 92. Bore is the same as the F20C at 87mm. So, the displacement is 2156cc.

Did i mention this is a F22C ??

Mar 1, 2006 | 08:07 AM

#64

suterusu

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 838

Likes: 5

From: MI

When you quoted Birdie, he was asking what the bore and stroke was on the F22.

Mar 1, 2006 | 11:56 AM

#65

Trip

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 1,245

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by suterusu,Mar 1 2006, 07:07 PM

When you quoted Birdie, he was asking what the bore and stroke was on the F22.

He also asked how to calculate displacement, hense my odd working formula

I should have specified that the # used are just to illustrate the formula

Mar 1, 2006 | 01:58 PM

#66

suterusu

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 838

Likes: 5

From: MI

oh, my bad.

Mar 1, 2006 | 03:17 PM

#67

Birdie

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 2,238

Likes: 0

From: So. Cali 626

2.4 liter is going to rock ! lets wait and see!

Apr 23, 2006 | 01:00 AM

#68

Trip

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 1,245

Likes: 0

I found another stroker Kit off the shelf which can rev up to 9000Rpm
CR is unknown.

Tracy sports
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/t...01%2FAP10007%2F

Apr 23, 2006 | 06:41 AM

#69

Jekyoo_Style

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 2,457

Likes: 0

From: Chicago

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip,Apr 23 2006, 03:00 AM

I found another stroker Kit off the shelf which can rev up to 9000Rpm
CR is unknown.

Tracy sports
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/t...01%2FAP10007%2F

http://bulletproofautomotive.com/cat...il.php?ID=4231

I'm sure if anyone is interested, Ben or ..Ben

can answer questions about it.