Just in from /.

http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?S...=AND&d=ft00&s1=''6,266,774''


or just read the following:

Method and system for securing, managing or optimizing a personal computer

Abstract

A system, method, and computer program product for delivery and automatic execution of security, management, or optimization software over an Internet connection to a user computer responsive to a user request entered via a web browser on the user computer. In a preferred embodiment, the user directs the Internet browser to a Internet clinical services provider web site computer and logs in to the site using an identifier and a secure password and optionally makes a selection of the type of servicing desired, wherein an automatically-executing software package encapsulated within a markup language communication unit deliverable across the Internet is delivered, to the user computer, the automatically-executing software package being adapted to perform security, management, or optimization functions on the user computer. User identifiers and passwords enabling the downloads may be provided on a per-download basis or on a subscription basis.

 

The link is not set up right and is not working. I even tried cutting and pasting the whole thing in a browser window.

I can't believe that someone was able to patent this. Does this mean that if you provide software using the asp model, you need to pay whoever filed this patent???

 

I think that seems to be the gist of what is stated in that paragraph... and if that is the case, there are a lot of businesses that will be screwed out of revenues and one rich mother-f*cker taking royalties.

HOWEVER, I have some serious doubts of this being able to hold up in a legal environment. It's way too generic - software isn't the same across the board. Almost like someone patenting the automobile...which would be a method of transport, providing 4 wheels, an engine, etc...