Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Computer Graphic Card Question? GeForce FX 5200 vs. GeForce 4 Ti 4200

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #1  
SoCalS2K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default Computer Graphic Card Question? GeForce FX 5200 vs. GeForce 4 Ti 4200

this seems like a dump question, but which one is better for gaming and general purpose?

GeForce FX 5200 128MB or GeForce 4 Ti 4200 64MB

thanks for the input
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #2  
cyber_x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

I'm no expert on video cards, but everything I've heard indicates that the GeForce 4 Ti 4200 is superior for games, and probably general use as well.

Main - and possibly only - advantage the GeForce FX 5200 has is DirectX 9 support.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 12:39 PM
  #3  
stockae92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

i have Ti4200

i am pretty happy with it, no complain

since i don't spend as much time on games nowadays, i am not looking to upgrade any time soon.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 12:44 PM
  #4  
suvh8r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Default

This was taken from:

http://www20.tomshardware.com/graphic/2003...3061/index.html

However, we can already give you some of our first impressions about the performance of the new cards. In the standard tests without FSAA and anitotropic filtering, the FX 5600 Ultra seems to be just about the same or slower than a GeForce4 Ti4200 8x and Radeon 9500 PRO. This might be due to the reduced pixel pipelines (2x2, as opposed to 4x2). With 4xFSAA, it appears to reach nearly double the performance of the 4200, beating a 4800 as well, but it loses out to the Radeon 9500 PRO. It's a similar picture with the anisotropic filtering. In the pixel shader tests from 3DMark 2001, it beats the 4200/2800, but loses in the vertex shader tests. In both tests, it clearly loses to the Radeon 9500 PRO.

The FX 5200 Ultra is quite a bit slower than the 5600 Ultra in the standard tests. In anti-aliasing, it's just a tad behind the Ti 4200. It's the same with anisotropic filtering - at least in Balanced mode. In Performance mode, it even manages to beat the 4800.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #5  
suvh8r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Default

In other words:

The 4200TI is proabably better.

The FX 5200 will look "pretier" as it has AA and other features, but it doesn't really have the Horsepower to push these effects for todays games (HL2, DOOMIII, ect..).

So unless you want to spend some money on a decent DX9 card (the lowest suggested off of www.pricewatch.com: $152 - RADEON 9600 XT 128MB ), then you are better off sticking with a 4200, or a 4400 Geforce card.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #6  
wannabuy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Default

fx 5900 $180 and it outdoes the Radeon 9800 in 90% of tests. Two of the guys at work have them and they test in the graphics tests we run way better than any other card tested. (All of the above.) Do a Yahoo search. You will get lots of info on the tests ran.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 09:58 PM
  #7  
Webcore's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Plano
Default

The Radeon 9800 XT is the best, fastest card available for tomorrow's new age of gaming. If you guys don't know, Dallas is the centralized place for Computer gaming, Internationally. ( http://www.thecpl.com ) Games like Doom3 and HL2 will run seemlessly on this card. The FX 5400 is out now (yes, it's brand spakin' new) and shows moderate gains over it's predecessor.

My vote, and the vote of all professional gamers ... ATI Radeon 9800 XT.

~ Ryan

P.S. The 9800 XT is a 256mb card.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #8  
S2000boi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Default

if you have 200 to spend go to newegg.com n get an ati radeon 9800 pro 128mb. that thing will last you 3 years from now. n is the best bang for the buck at 200 price.

heres a list of best card starting top down

radeon 9800 xt
geforce fx 5950
radeon 9800 pro
geforce fx 5900 ultra
geforce fx 5900
radeon 9800
geforce fx 5700ultra
radeon 9600xt
geforce 5700
radeon 9500 pro
geforce fx 5600 ultra
radeon 9600 pro
radeon 9600
geforce fx 5600

anything else is not worth buying.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 04:39 AM
  #9  
suvh8r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Default

Man, he's talking about GeForce 4 Ti 4200 64MB and you guys are pointing him to the 9800xt (I actually do have that card )? I'm sure if he's looking at older Geforce 4200s, he's not going to want to spend a car payment on the latest Radeon.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 10:35 AM
  #10  
SoCalS2K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

so in short:

GeForce 4 Ti 4200 64MB better than GeForce FX 5200 128MB?

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:03 AM.