Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Just test drove a RSX Type S....its fast!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 1, 2001 | 01:33 PM
  #51  
ChrisD's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

the salesman took it off the lot with me shotgun and he redlined it and drove it like he stole it...It had 33 miles on it....He actually hit 8500 rpm...and it still wanted to go higher...

Greeeeeeeaaaaat. Can't wait to be the proud owner of THAT properly broken in engine.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2001 | 01:40 PM
  #52  
s2klady's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: High Point
Default

I think this car is ugly!!!!!!!! No comparison to the s2k!
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2001 | 02:15 PM
  #53  
s2ktaxi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Went to look at one today - it did not look as good in person as I expected.

The shifter is no where near as good in feel or as short in throw as the S2000 (new or not). But if you need a rear seat and the high VTEC revs, then it would be a good choice.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2001 | 02:59 PM
  #54  
Iggy_Type_R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

I know the Type S is what you get in teh US but really ... it's unfair to compare it to the S2000. If you read all the reviews and docs on the new ITR (I refuse to call it RSX! ), that's a WHOLE different story! APARENTLY (and I don't remember where I read it but I did) the new ITR has a better power to weight ratio than the S2000 ... but I am not sure how true that is since the #s are still not close enough to the s2000 ... may be that's cause of the FWD vs RWD config.

ANyway ... Type S vs S2000 no chance
Type R vs S2000 -> "healthy" competition
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2001 | 03:05 PM
  #55  
s2ktaxi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

I wasn't commenting on the performance of the S2000 vs RSXR (ITR) - just the few things that I did comment on. However, if we had an RSX-R or ITR here in the US, I would get one in a second as a hot weather and cold weather car to supplement the S2000.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2001 | 07:58 PM
  #56  
Iggy_Type_R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by s2ktaxi
[B]I wasn't commenting on the performance of the S2000 vs RSXR (ITR) - just the few things that I did comment on.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2001 | 09:57 AM
  #57  
FlyingPig's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: USR, NJ
Default

Guys, give him a break, will ya?
RSX is a very good small luxury coupe that happens to be very fast for the price tag.
Consider the warranty, comfort for such a small car and performance for a FWD, it is very nice. And, it will be a hit.
Not that I would think for a second about trading a stook in for it, but I'm definitely thinking about picking one up as a beater. (now more than ever......kinda scared when they said it was going to be 25k)
Maybe you can get it for 21k by the end of this year.........it would make a perfect leased beater.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2001 | 10:03 AM
  #58  
SiK182's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: BH
Default

Way to beat the shit out of it before it's break-in period is over....Sucks for whoever buys that one....
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2001 | 10:04 AM
  #59  
SiK182's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: BH
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ChrisD
[B]
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2001 | 07:50 AM
  #60  
Sev's Avatar
Sev
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by babylou
[B]

Octane is rated differently in the USA than in Oz.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:13 AM.