Linux help

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Dec 31, 2001 | 11:56 AM

#21

turbolane

Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2001

Posts: 1,610

Likes: 1

From: Clearlake, CA

Can someone test ftp.ifd.com (216.43.197.221) now? They say they have fixed it and they traceroute and ping fine, but I still can't from my Cable connecction.

Dec 31, 2001 | 12:01 PM

#22

Strike

Former Moderator

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 3,826

Likes: 5

From: Denver CO

I can't hit it. I tried using an ftp program and also tried pinging the ip address as well as ftp.ifd.com. They all come back with timeouts.

Dec 31, 2001 | 12:01 PM

#23

moonpie

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2001

Posts: 1,611

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne

I am connected to your ftp server...woohoo!

fitting hostname - penguin1

Dec 31, 2001 | 12:06 PM

#24

Strike

Former Moderator

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 3,826

Likes: 5

From: Denver CO

I can connect now too. Can also ping obviously. Whatever change they made must have taken a little time to propograte or something.

Dec 31, 2001 | 12:08 PM

#25

turbolane

Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2001

Posts: 1,610

Likes: 1

From: Clearlake, CA

Well, not sure why, but the DHCP connection seems to make a difference. At 2:05pm I turned it off.

Dec 31, 2001 | 12:10 PM

#26

moonpie

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2001

Posts: 1,611

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne

lane: you really need to upgrade wu-ftpd as the version you're running is vulnerable in a couple different ways. Visit http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/

for more info. Glad you got the issue resolved

Dec 31, 2001 | 12:17 PM

#27

turbolane

Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2001

Posts: 1,610

Likes: 1

From: Clearlake, CA

[QUOTE]Originally posted by moonpie
[B]lane: you really need to upgrade wu-ftpd as the version you're running is vulnerable in a couple different ways.

Dec 31, 2001 | 12:59 PM

#28

cthree

Administrator

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 20,274

Likes: 4

From: Toronto, Canada

Ok, I think I remember what's going on here. Type netstat -nr. You probably have 2 routes to 0.0.0.0. You need to remove one of them. I think you've got two default routes.

Dec 31, 2001 | 01:20 PM

#29

DSF_S2k

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 1,414

Likes: 0

From: Houston, Texas

Ok ....

216.43.152.64 (zzz-216043152065.splitrock.net) is still dropping the route or the server is down.

Dale

Dec 31, 2001 | 01:24 PM

#30

moonpie

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2001

Posts: 1,611

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne

I can still connect. Yes, the order the interfaces are brought up can become an issue if DHCP is used because DHCP often provides a default route. This is of course configure-able in ISC's version of dhcpd.

Reply Share

First
Prev
3 / 6
Next
Last