Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Not here to start a Mac vs PC war

Old Sep 9, 2010 | 06:33 AM
  #51  
Gymkata's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,720
Likes: 0
Default

Mac FMFW!
Even a mini-horse likes a Mac


Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 06:35 AM
  #52  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Quick2K,Sep 8 2010, 10:57 PM
Perhaps we can agree on some middle ground: Windows Vista was awful; Windows 7 is superb; and Snow Leopard does not play well with games.

Truce?
Vista = Windows 7 plain and simple. The code is the same exact thing. The only difference is very minor additions added under the hood and a new look to make people think it's different.


Also, snow leopard on my laptop plays starcraft 2 / steam perfectly fine for me when I'm at lan parties
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 07:23 AM
  #53  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

[QUOTE=Riceboi,Sep 9 2010, 02:52 AM] I would like to know why they are better putting costs aside even assuming they are the same price, why are macs better than non-macs?
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 07:28 AM
  #54  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Sep 9 2010, 10:32 AM
I'm not sure why no one has brought this up, the average person isn't going to buy a friggen Mac Pro. The average person would buy a mac mini / Imac both of which are MUCH cheaper and are designed for the average user. Lots of bias in this thread.
Plus, hardware is not all that Macs are about - people that argue against Macs based on hardware don't get it - you're overlooking all the software and integrated process design that makes actually using the thing possible and easy.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 09:01 AM
  #55  
00CivicSi's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,583
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Sep 8 2010, 09:31 PM
. . . I can say first hand there are an equal amount of retarded people on both sides of the fence.
^ This!

And, as another that uses both PCs and MACs on a daily basis, my viewpoint is that regardless of which side you're on, most all of those flaming the other are the same kind of uniformed and ignorant people that happen to pick a side and defend it to the end as if it were their born religion most probably because 1) that's what they experienced first, or 2) they had some equally uninformed and ignorant person that they viewed as some sort of 'roll model.'

Seriously, of all the stupid things to argue over. And even worse, the amount of judging that people have over others based on their computer choice.

I've found that each of my computers has its strengths and weaknesses against the other, which is the reason that I use both. Pick what meets your needs and move on.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 09:16 AM
  #56  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Sep 9 2010, 10:28 AM
Plus, hardware is not all that Macs are about - people that argue against Macs based on hardware don't get it - you're overlooking all the software and integrated process design that makes actually using the thing possible and easy.
Yep as I said

I'd never say macs are "better," they are the same thing running what I would consider more specalized software.

Apples biggest advantage over M$ is that they control the hardware going into their machines thus can write code specifically to that hardware. M$ has to write general code that encompasses a bunch of different items. I'd argue that M$'s job is actually harder than apples but that's another story.

Basically it comes down to OSX being (IMO) much more stable then the windows equivelent. Also, since it runs based on unix, it is inherently more secure (not to say it's unbeatable).


And yes, you do pay for the apple "look and build quality." I'll admit it, I think they make the best laptop hands down. It might not be the most top of the line mobile desktop gamer nerd laptop (yes I fall into the gamer nerd group so don't give me crap about it) in the world, but damn it looks / feels / runs flawlessly. Tell that to the ugly plastic dell laptops that you can bend with your handss.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 09:18 AM
  #57  
exb00st's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Sep 9 2010, 08:28 AM
Plus, hardware is not all that Macs are about - people that argue against Macs based on hardware don't get it - you're overlooking all the software and integrated process design that makes actually using the thing possible and easy.
This.

Ever see comparo sample photos of the iPhone 4 (which I hate) vs. the Droid Incredible's (which I have and like very much)? The iPhone has a 5MP camera vs the Inc's 8 and Apple wins. This can be demo'd in other areas such as well, where the Mac loses the spec war but outperforms.

I grew up on PC's (dad was a techie in the 80's and 90's). Over the years I'd always customized my PC to work the way I wanted from applications to appearance to system ops. I spent LOTS of time doing this along with dabbling in diff. programming languages. When I started working at my current job, they used all Macs and I immediately thought, "WTF have I been doing all these years?" So I bought a MacBook Pro a couple of years ago. This isn't to say this is how everyone will see things. Macs fit better for my purpose/work environment. They just work for me.

Not to mention any sort of customer service you'll receive. Any parts that fail, even without Apple Care have been replaced without question, which has only occurred once due to nVidia's faulty video cards. Same with the iPhone's I've had (which I'm not a fan of).
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #58  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,435
Likes: 1,651
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by Kyushin,Sep 9 2010, 06:01 AM
Another thing about Apple Fan Bois are they are the same people who will bitch at their children for wanting to wear designer clothes. Hypocritical? But if you dont mind paying way above current market price for 4 yr old technology then by all means!


Remember, we're trying to have a real discussion about technology, not tribal customs in the late 20th and 21st Century. Take your anthropological studies somewhere else.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 10:06 AM
  #59  
thebig33tuna's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,283
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Originally Posted by 8D_In_Trunk,Sep 9 2010, 01:03 PM


Remember, we're trying to have a real discussion about technology, not tribal customs in the late 20th and 21st Century. Take your anthropological studies somewhere else.
Don't be too hard on him.

A cop once beat him senseless with an iPod.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 10:07 AM
  #60  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,435
Likes: 1,651
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by exb00st,Sep 9 2010, 09:18 AM
When I started working at my current job, they used all Macs and I immediately thought, "WTF have I been doing all these years?" So I bought a MacBook Pro a couple of years ago. This isn't to say this is how everyone will see things. Macs fit better for my purpose/work environment. They just work for me.
Wait wait wait. . . so, let me get this straight:

1. You had a set of problems.
2. You acquired the right tool to address that set of problems.
3. You did so while overcoming a perceived notion that control over the system might be less effective than coherent system integration?

Go eff yourself. You have no business in this thread.


Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:20 PM.