notebook for college sis
Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Jul 25 2006, 06:32 PM
Why would I want to buy a propriatary PC? Why would anyone. Especially now that they have the many of the same componets for nearly 3x as much as a PC. No thank you. I;ve used them, they look slick the OS is a great piece of programing the hardware is dramatically overpriced and I'm a developer. What good is it to develop programs for a continously coming back from near death platform?
I'm assuming that your response will be something like:
"wtf?! Id on't NeEd to own onE of Those appel cOputers. TheY sucKorz. Look hoW much thEy cost! FoR thE saMe prIce you CAn get This ThaT etc oN a PC. PC rulez and MaCs Suckzzz"
Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Jul 25 2006, 07:28 PM
Comparatively priced,
Where do you shop for pc's Versaci?Apples best is $3,300 ! There second best is $2500 while a comparable Gateway is around $800 with four times as much memory, faster processor... If you added a dual dual core mother board you be around $2000 You could even make it better and upgrade the gateway by buying two video cards SLi and still be under $2200 a full grand under the best apple.
There is no reason for these unreasonable prices.
Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Jul 25 2006, 07:28 PM
Apples best is $3,300 ! There second best is $2500 while a comparable Gateway is around $800 with four times as much memory, faster processor... If you added a dual dual core mother board you be around $2000 You could even make it better and upgrade the gateway by buying two video cards SLi and still be under $2200 a full grand under the best apple.
All for $800! Add a better video card for $200 that $1000 $2,300 cheaper than Apples best, apple great value?
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?sk...mprd58700050003
All for $800! Add a better video card for $200 that $1000 $2,300 cheaper than Apples best, apple great value?
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?sk...mprd58700050003
anyways, to compare the quadcore G5 @ $3300 vs. that $800 Gateway is not even a good comparison. this is the top of the line tower, compare the cost of a top of the line PC tower instead. the quad is equivalent to 4 processors the Gateway is not. i believe it is a pentium D. much slower system bus, half the cache, RAM expandable to 2gigs vs 16 gigs on the Quad (don't laugh, i know someone with 8 gigs who wants more and actually needs more
), its not fair.Is the mac overpriced, well, if it is its not by too much IMO. You get what you pay for.
I mean how much would a quadcore AMD or Pentium cost, i'm sure it won't be near $800. link the price of that machine if they are even out yet. i know you do programming so you may not care, i work in graphics and sometimes video, the render times on a quadcore put to shame any other computer MAC or PC.
its kind of like saying, why get a carerra gt when you can buy an s2000 boost it with all the bells and whistles then be comparable to a half million dollar car.

Oh, to the OP, can you let us know what you end up getting your sister

here is a link testing the cpu's: http://www.geekpatrol.ca/blog/76/


the MAC is better than PC in graphics i disagree with, at least regarding PRINT work. i dont do video work....
but i have worked with both, starting out in design with MACS, a g4...
they cost more, but were no ways near as fast or functional as my PC...
I can have Quark, Illustrator, and Photoshop running, along with web, and document files open and my PC runs seemlesly
and what i design looks incredible on my laptops 17 in truebright LCD.
throw in an ATI mobile card and you have your graphics..
I just cannot see how people can justify spending close to a thousand dollars more for less than what they could be getting...
heres an idea, worried about windows security?? get educated, take that extra cash your saving and buy some protection, or buy some books, read them, and learn your shit!
but i have worked with both, starting out in design with MACS, a g4...
they cost more, but were no ways near as fast or functional as my PC...
I can have Quark, Illustrator, and Photoshop running, along with web, and document files open and my PC runs seemlesly
and what i design looks incredible on my laptops 17 in truebright LCD.
throw in an ATI mobile card and you have your graphics..
I just cannot see how people can justify spending close to a thousand dollars more for less than what they could be getting...
heres an idea, worried about windows security?? get educated, take that extra cash your saving and buy some protection, or buy some books, read them, and learn your shit!
Originally Posted by meth,Jul 26 2006, 03:18 AM
i just want this poor girl to get a laptop MAC or PC doesn't really matter to me. i do agree she can probably get by with a $400 PC, but i also think she may be better off with a macbook.
anyways, to compare the quadcore G5 @ $3300 vs. that $800 Gateway is not even a good comparison. this is the top of the line tower, compare the cost of a top of the line PC tower instead. the quad is equivalent to 4 processors the Gateway is not. i believe it is a pentium D. much slower system bus, half the cache, RAM expandable to 2gigs vs 16 gigs on the Quad (don't laugh, i know someone with 8 gigs who wants more and actually needs more
), its not fair.
Is the mac overpriced, well, if it is its not by too much IMO. You get what you pay for.
I mean how much would a quadcore AMD or Pentium cost, i'm sure it won't be near $800. link the price of that machine if they are even out yet. i know you do programming so you may not care, i work in graphics and sometimes video, the render times on a quadcore put to shame any other computer MAC or PC.
its kind of like saying, why get a carerra gt when you can buy an s2000 boost it with all the bells and whistles then be comparable to a half million dollar car.
Oh, to the OP, can you let us know what you end up getting your sister
here is a link testing the cpu's: http://www.geekpatrol.ca/blog/76/
anyways, to compare the quadcore G5 @ $3300 vs. that $800 Gateway is not even a good comparison. this is the top of the line tower, compare the cost of a top of the line PC tower instead. the quad is equivalent to 4 processors the Gateway is not. i believe it is a pentium D. much slower system bus, half the cache, RAM expandable to 2gigs vs 16 gigs on the Quad (don't laugh, i know someone with 8 gigs who wants more and actually needs more
), its not fair.Is the mac overpriced, well, if it is its not by too much IMO. You get what you pay for.
I mean how much would a quadcore AMD or Pentium cost, i'm sure it won't be near $800. link the price of that machine if they are even out yet. i know you do programming so you may not care, i work in graphics and sometimes video, the render times on a quadcore put to shame any other computer MAC or PC.
its kind of like saying, why get a carerra gt when you can buy an s2000 boost it with all the bells and whistles then be comparable to a half million dollar car.

Oh, to the OP, can you let us know what you end up getting your sister

here is a link testing the cpu's: http://www.geekpatrol.ca/blog/76/
Originally Posted by superjimbo,Jul 25 2006, 11:12 PM
exactly. like every other mac hater...you've never even owned an apple yet you can't stop whining about everything that's wrong about them. hmmmm. typical.
I'm assuming that your response will be something like:
"wtf?! Id on't NeEd to own onE of Those appel cOputers. TheY sucKorz. Look hoW much thEy cost! FoR thE saMe prIce you CAn get This ThaT etc oN a PC. PC rulez and MaCs Suckzzz"
I'm assuming that your response will be something like:
"wtf?! Id on't NeEd to own onE of Those appel cOputers. TheY sucKorz. Look hoW much thEy cost! FoR thE saMe prIce you CAn get This ThaT etc oN a PC. PC rulez and MaCs Suckzzz"

There's nothing wrong with the internals, it all about the shutting the common man out of the market by being "elite", overcharging and in the extent of developing it just doesn't make sense
Just like a MAC fan boy to not see how increadibly overpriced it is.
Originally Posted by iwantyourcar,Jul 26 2006, 06:50 AM
the MAC is better than PC in graphics i disagree with, at least regarding PRINT work. i dont do video work....
but i have worked with both, starting out in design with MACS, a g4...
they cost more, but were no ways near as fast or functional as my PC...
I can have Quark, Illustrator, and Photoshop running, along with web, and document files open and my PC runs seemlesly
and what i design looks incredible on my laptops 17 in truebright LCD.
throw in an ATI mobile card and you have your graphics..
I just cannot see how people can justify spending close to a thousand dollars more for less than what they could be getting...
heres an idea, worried about windows security?? get educated, take that extra cash your saving and buy some protection, or buy some books, read them, and learn your shit!
but i have worked with both, starting out in design with MACS, a g4...
they cost more, but were no ways near as fast or functional as my PC...
I can have Quark, Illustrator, and Photoshop running, along with web, and document files open and my PC runs seemlesly
and what i design looks incredible on my laptops 17 in truebright LCD.
throw in an ATI mobile card and you have your graphics..
I just cannot see how people can justify spending close to a thousand dollars more for less than what they could be getting...
heres an idea, worried about windows security?? get educated, take that extra cash your saving and buy some protection, or buy some books, read them, and learn your shit!
Listen guys you own a MAC cool great have fun. You paid extra for whatever it was you liked about it. Maybe it's just the OS or maybe the cool plastic surrounding many of the same basic compunents in most PCs, fine. That's your call and I do think it look better but as for being a value at about a grand more, the hassels that surround it. Well I disagree with you. I'll leave it at that. I already posted the comparable systems and prices. The discussion of the OS is purely a matter of opinion. Its a fact that more developers, develop for windows. The quality of the product might be better than brand X but isn't better than some brand Y PCs. I've only had two failures in my life, viruses are a non issue for the people with a clue.
i don't think bad, less or anything remotly negative about MAC owners. I just don't share the opinion that its even remotely better.
Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Jul 26 2006, 07:23 AM
A
for common sense.
Listen guys you own a MAC cool great have fun. You paid extra for whatever it was you liked about it. Maybe it's just the OS or maybe the cool plastic surrounding many of the same basic compunents in most PCs, fine. That's your call and I do think it look better but as for being a value at about a grand more, the hassels that surround it. Well I disagree with you. I'll leave it at that. I already posted the comparable systems and prices. The discussion of the OS is purely a matter of opinion. Its a fact that more developers, develop for windows. The quality of the product might be better than brand X but isn't better than some brand Y PCs. I've only had two failures in my life, viruses are a non issue for the people with a clue.
i don't think bad, less or anything remotly negative about MAC owners. I just don't share the opinion that its even remotely better.
Listen guys you own a MAC cool great have fun. You paid extra for whatever it was you liked about it. Maybe it's just the OS or maybe the cool plastic surrounding many of the same basic compunents in most PCs, fine. That's your call and I do think it look better but as for being a value at about a grand more, the hassels that surround it. Well I disagree with you. I'll leave it at that. I already posted the comparable systems and prices. The discussion of the OS is purely a matter of opinion. Its a fact that more developers, develop for windows. The quality of the product might be better than brand X but isn't better than some brand Y PCs. I've only had two failures in my life, viruses are a non issue for the people with a clue.
i don't think bad, less or anything remotly negative about MAC owners. I just don't share the opinion that its even remotely better.






