Star Trek

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Mar 9, 2009 | 03:30 PM

#21

HowardZinn

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 417

Likes: 0

imo Star Trek does need a reinvention and Abrams is probably the right guy (sci-fi, comic geek with some experience doing big movies).

Can't wait to see it!

Mar 10, 2009 | 08:41 AM

#22

PrimoGen

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 16,759

Likes: 1

From: Sun★Works

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slamnasty,Mar 9 2009, 05:45 PM

But to get off the serious crap, which is a worse watch? ST 5: The Final Frontier, or SW Episode 1?

wow

that is a hard question answer....really it is

I would have to say ST5 since SW1 had the pod race

and very good effects

Mar 10, 2009 | 10:18 AM

#23

Slamnasty

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 4,535

Likes: 0

From: Phoenix

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrimoGen,Mar 10 2009, 08:41 AM

wow

that is a hard question answer....really it is

I would have to say ST5 since SW1 had the pod race

and very good effects

My pick is SW1, since ST5 is shorter and doesn't have a Jar-Jar. I do give SW1 the pod race and Sith fights (SW sword fighting doesn't bug me at all). But at least ST5 is quick even if the story is thin and cheesy, and the resolution at the end is a total oh-come-on.

FX-wise it's hard to compare a 1999 movie to a 1989 movie.

Mar 10, 2009 | 10:23 AM

#24

PrimoGen

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 16,759

Likes: 1

From: Sun★Works

I cant give ST5 a pass EVER

Spocks brother searching for Shakari only to find a pasty floating head at the end of the journey is unforgivable

ST1 was a better film and that one sucked hind tit