Is your green really my green?
You can only detect 3 distinct colors, one absence of color- black, and all three- white. You can then combine them based on reflectance (or refraction or the combination). All combinations are mental extrapolations (as are the initial 5 for that matter) of those detections along a continuum. You calibrate this continuum through social experience and multiple observations.
Originally Posted by MikeyCB,Jul 23 2008, 11:47 PM
Hmmm interesting point.
So you're saying that when people are tone deaf and sound like poop singing something back, it's because their voice can't mimic correctly, not because their ears don't know the difference?
So you're saying that when people are tone deaf and sound like poop singing something back, it's because their voice can't mimic correctly, not because their ears don't know the difference?
Originally Posted by oOweEe,Jul 24 2008, 06:53 PM
i believe its a topic in qualia in philosophy. some people may have reversed spectrums, which means that not everyone sees the same thing.
Originally Posted by 3vilmonkey!,Jul 21 2008, 11:36 PM
We all grew up and learned that blue is blue, green is green, red is red, ect and so on. The thing is that we recognize colors by their associated name.
What if your purple is really my red? And my green is really your blue? But we all call them the same color because we grew up knowing that this color is called "green"
What if your purple is really my red? And my green is really your blue? But we all call them the same color because we grew up knowing that this color is called "green"
BC: I wonder if people all see the same colors the same. I bet that they don't. I might see one color and you might see another, but we've both learned that the color we see is called "brown", so we would never know.
Peter: That's ridiculous!
BC: OK, I'll prove it to you. What color is that rock?
Peter: Gray.
BC: Wrong.
(And, for the record, the best color is green.)
Other than what everyone has mentioned about wavelight, color perception, etc. Would it also matter that we 'classify' almost everything we perceive.
Let's say a we have two red S2000's (car A and B) parked next to each other, and a Silverstone (car C); if a group of individuals were to compare the color 'red' on these cars, they would agree that the 'color' looks the same for car A and B, but not from car C.
So, we are classifying a color perception as red, because is perceived the same for both cars.
It is the same for saying "Silverstone", what is that? at the end of the day is just a variation of silver, or grey, or light black, so Honda called it Silverstone, and we all agree is not completely silver, but is not light black, and not pure grey, is an in between mixture.
Just my opinion.
Let's say a we have two red S2000's (car A and B) parked next to each other, and a Silverstone (car C); if a group of individuals were to compare the color 'red' on these cars, they would agree that the 'color' looks the same for car A and B, but not from car C.
So, we are classifying a color perception as red, because is perceived the same for both cars.
It is the same for saying "Silverstone", what is that? at the end of the day is just a variation of silver, or grey, or light black, so Honda called it Silverstone, and we all agree is not completely silver, but is not light black, and not pure grey, is an in between mixture.
Just my opinion.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




