Official "Official" Forum All your "Official" threads!

crazy offsets only...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 06:12 PM
  #811  
AP2 David's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by nichigo,Jul 5 2008, 03:22 PM
I'm running 245's in the front right now and I have 0 problems...I'll be upgrading to 255's soon. There are tons of ppl here running 255 all around.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #812  
SidwayS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Anyone have any idea how much negative camber i would have to run on 17x8 the front +28 offset and 17x10 in the rear +35 offset with rolled fenders and stretched tires of course??
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #813  
f20milo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=nichigo,Jul 5 2008, 03:22 PM] I'm running 245's in the front right now and I have 0 problems...I'll be upgrading to 255's soon.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #814  
Antonov's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by HvRRZ,Jul 5 2008, 07:49 AM
eurotrashdtm - As you can see in my sig I already have one daily, and am in the process of getting another. Now the S will be made into a strictly for track purposes. While it's great in stock form I feel like I need to move on and take it to another level. I'm still undecided as to what route to take for power. Whatever it is though these width for the tires will come in handy.
If you're going to be road racing, run 255 non stagg. 275 will only slow you down.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #815  
nichigo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,586
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by eurotrashdtm,Jul 5 2008, 09:55 PM
If you're going to be road racing, run 255 non stagg. 275 will only slow you down.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #816  
nichigo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,586
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by SidwayS2k,Jul 5 2008, 08:18 PM
Anyone have any idea how much negative camber i would have to run on 17x8 the front +28 offset and 17x10 in the rear +35 offset with rolled fenders and stretched tires of course??
With those widths, i'd play it safe with a 255 tire and run +50 for both the front and rear. You'll need a roll and probably -2 all around
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 11:16 PM
  #817  
subsoniic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area - killa kali
Default

hmm im a newbie.. wuts all this aggression for ? is it for better handling ? is it practical ? from what im assuming wont this drag the car more, since you have to do some crazy camber to it ? in a straight line i see the car has to struggle more to go straight, but in the corners i guess its a good thing ? but when is to much camber a bad thing ? im not hating or anything, i love the looks.. any info would be greatly appreciated !
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 01:36 AM
  #818  
stealthx32's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Default

Aggressive wheel fitments is for looks. People usually do non-beneficial-to-performance things to try and fit aggressive wheels under fenders, including too much lowering, too much camber, etc. You can argue that it performs better by widening the track, but that's never the primary reason, because most do not opt to fit larger tires, which should be the first thing you should try to do.

Too much camber is bad for a lot of reasons. It reduces your contact patch, which means #1, it lengthens your braking distance. #2, too much rear camber reduces your rear grip, which directly affects your ability to put down power (and in turn, increases the risk of you spinning). And of course it hurts your tire wear characteristics.

S2000's with it's double wishbone suspension has relatively good camber gain from the factory. While the factory alignment specifications *is* a compromise between being that it's a street car and consumers require reasonable tire wear characteristics, running excessive amounts of camber is not increasing your grip since you're only using the inner half of your tire. Perhaps if you ran aggressive camber with race tires, you'd be able to generate enough grip to use the entire tire, but I have no empirical data on any tires.

It shouldn't hurt your straightline stability or speed, because radial tires maintain a constant across the tread width, regardless of the load characteristics (until you start heavily wearing one edge more than the rest of the tire).

That said, I think it looks badass. It's a street car, and I'm fine with not getting 10/10ths of grip out of it.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 01:46 AM
  #819  
subsoniic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area - killa kali
Default

amen brotha, thanks for the input !
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 07:37 AM
  #820  
HvRRZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

I believe I have learned quiet a bit already. I've already made my decision, and just wanted to say thanks to everyone throwing in their helpful tips. I'll rethink tire sizes as well and possible go a bit lower.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 PM.