Photography and Videography Tips, techniques and equipment for taking great photographs and videos. Come here for advice and critique on your photos and videos. To show off your S2000 go to The Gallery

MacBook Pro vs PC

 
Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:44 AM
  #1  
jtpassat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,890
Likes: 0
Default MacBook Pro vs PC

Age old question but with a new twist. Now that the Macbook Pro is on the Intel platform, what reasons would there be to stay or switch to a Mac?

Is it still faster for photo processing?

Better at memory handling?

etc...
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #2  
F1-Fanatic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,242
Likes: 0
From: Branford, CT
Default

Originally Posted by jtpassat,Feb 22 2007, 01:44 PM
Age old question but with a new twist. Now that the Macbook Pro is on the Intel platform, what reasons would there be to stay or switch to a Mac?

Is it still faster for photo processing?

Better at memory handling?

etc...
Im kinda partial to the Comodore 64 platform myself...
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #3  
stphotographer's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
Default

Is there even a difference now? They are both Intel machines, just depends on if you like MacOS or Windows.

Amiga needs to make a comeback
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #4  
Poindexter's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 3
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Originally Posted by stphotographer,Feb 22 2007, 03:34 PM
Amiga needs to make a comeback
along with Atari consoles


The more time passes the less the debate between Apple and PC is as strong. I love the Apple OS, but hate the fact that I can't use it for work and I'm invested up the wazoo in PC stuff.

Since this is the photography forum, shouldn't this debate be more along the lines of which is better for photography? In that debate I'm not sure there is a clear winner anymore. Maybe PC's because you can build a Photoshop/Storage monster for much less than you can do it with Apple hardware.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #5  
brushman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Default

I have one and it's fine as long as you are not a heavy "gamer".

I also have a tiny vaio and it is fine as well.

I would choose the MBP over the VAIO simple because I like Mac OS better...jm2c
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #6  
iLuveketchup's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,907
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

For photo processing, I would stay away from the Intel Core Duo for Macs like the plague (for the time being). CS2 is not coded to run on Intel Core duo for Macs. So you will be running off the Rosetta emulator every time you use CS2 on Intel Macs. This means that CS2 will run ridiculously slow! I'm looking into getting a Mac Pro myself, but I'll wait until CS3 comes out (coded for Intel Core duo for Macs).
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #7  
jtpassat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,890
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Poindexter,Feb 22 2007, 05:18 PM

Since this is the photography forum, shouldn't this debate be more along the lines of which is better for photography? In that debate I'm not sure there is a clear winner anymore. Maybe PC's because you can build a Photoshop/Storage monster for much less than you can do it with Apple hardware.
that's what i meant. now that they are both on intel chips, would photoshop (when CS3 comes out) and any other graphical tools be faster or the same on a Mac vs. PC?

Trending Topics

Old Feb 23, 2007 | 02:56 AM
  #8  
hyb's Avatar
hyb
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
From: Dorset/Somerset
Default

Originally Posted by iLuveketchup,Feb 22 2007, 02:41 PM
For photo processing, I would stay away from the Intel Core Duo for Macs like the plague (for the time being). CS2 is not coded to run on Intel Core duo for Macs. So you will be running off the Rosetta emulator every time you use CS2 on Intel Macs. This means that CS2 will run ridiculously slow! I'm looking into getting a Mac Pro myself, but I'll wait until CS3 comes out (coded for Intel Core duo for Macs).
CS3 beta is out and works very quick. Easy to remove the time limit too

I have one of the first 1.83's when they first came out and it's by far the best laptop I've ever owned.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 03:17 AM
  #9  
John57's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 1
From: At Home
Default

My first Windows laptop has done what all windows stuff does in time with more bits added, etc... it gets sooooo confused it just locks up and throws a fit.

I bought a 15" Mac G4 and it has never missed a beat.

I now have a 17" 2.16Ghz MacBook Pro and again, no problems. The screens are great - though others have caught up in this area and I personally don't find the lack of CS2 a problem. I use Aperture and the other half who is a pro photographer uses Lightroom. CS can be used if needed but we don't go into massive post processing.

Macs are more expensive but I just love the fact they are - at least in my experience - more reliable.

The other half uses a G5 desktop as her main machine and, like the laptops it works really well. She needs the processing power and reliability for her business to function - and thats why we will be sticking with Macs for now !
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Riceboi
Off-topic Talk
140
Sep 15, 2010 04:00 PM
The Raptor
The Corner
2
Jul 12, 2006 12:14 PM
amongmany
Off-topic Talk
4
Dec 4, 2004 04:50 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 AM.