S2000 Engine Management Engine management topics, map and advice.

Stand Alone ECU what is best? :?:

Thread Tools
 
Old May 30, 2010 | 09:29 PM
  #1  
OneSilverS2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
Default Stand Alone ECU what is best? :?:

I have been debating doing a different motor swap or just turbocharging the S. After some thinking for about a month I decided that the best thing to do is turbo it.

I would like to get a full complete standalone system for the car. No SAFC, or chip sets to " trick " any sensors like others people do.

I would like to go with AEM. It looks to be after a bit of research it looks like I would like to use this standalone. Now I have seen them range so far from $1300.00-$1800.00.

My goals:

I would like a reliable 400WHP
Engine will be rebuilt with eagle rods, CP pistons, ACL bearing set. Block guard, etc..

What are the advantages to the AEM computers and which will best suit me. I want to go all out, but before I do I am goign tof idn the best user friendly standalone for the S2000.

Thanks.
Reply
Old May 31, 2010 | 10:02 PM
  #2  
OneSilverS2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
Default

Anyone> ? <
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #3  
OneSilverS2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
Default

...
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 11:41 AM
  #4  
DFWs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Default

search aem vs kpro, it depends on what you value
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 12:28 PM
  #5  
wadzii's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 11
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

find a tuner you like/trust and use what the tuner wants to use.

they are both good, but they are both garbage in the hands of someone who isnt very good with it,
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #6  
OneSilverS2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
Default

Alright I will look into everything. I just want a good system to start with, and I know what can happen with the wrong person tuning it.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2010 | 08:11 AM
  #7  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

If you have an '06+, then I think it would be hard to argue that the FlashPro wouldn't be the best choice.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2010 | 11:17 AM
  #8  
DFWs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 2
From: Denton, TX
Default

in his sig, it says '00
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #9  
JustinC's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1
From: Selma, TX
Default

In terms of ease of use, installation of the aem could be considered easier and cheaper b/c of the cost of the ECM and the fact you just plug it in.

I can say that the software on the kpro is a lot easier to use, I am very familiar with KPRO and when I look at the AEMpro software it is very confusing. You can obviously tune every single aspect of the AEM where KPRO has the stock logic in the background making the number of tables you have access to or can manipulate less.

So basically if you are going to build a race car, I would say go AEM, if you just want a car you are going to mod but will always be a street car with a simple bolt on system, I would say KPRO would probably be easiest for you to maintain.

This is not to start any kind of debate, just my own opinion for what it's worth.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 08:56 AM
  #10  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

aem ems 1052u series 1 box. but i am biased lol.

you can find them used in FS section for about a grand. great bang for the buck.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RXM9600
S2000 Engine Management
11
Oct 1, 2016 03:41 AM
Importedpower
S2000 Engine Management
11
Jun 8, 2011 12:47 PM
JDMpearlwhyteZ
S2000 Modifications and Parts
16
Jan 18, 2011 04:45 PM
bullitt5897
S2000 Forced Induction
20
Oct 25, 2007 11:25 AM
AndyDoh
S2000 Under The Hood
4
Mar 25, 2003 05:46 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 AM.