S2000 Engine Management Engine management topics, map and advice.

Success with AEM O2 feedback?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 26, 2010 | 05:12 AM
  #11  
wadzii's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 11
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by maluch,Jun 25 2010, 10:15 PM
AT 8000 rpms the aem unit reads the AFR every 8 revolutions, which to me seems sufficient enough to use at wot...why do you think they are too slow.
it takes time for the exhaust gasses to get to the sensor, then time to sample, time to process and time to make the change.. by then the engine is past the rpm that it needed the change.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2010 | 10:19 AM
  #12  
maluch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Lindehurst, NY
Default

time to process is not an issue...if the computer is fast enough to control the engine at high rpms then it is fast enough for this operation.

the determining variables here are the rate of change of the engine speed and the time that it takes exhaust gases to make it from the cylinder to the 02 sensor.

if considering the first two gears on an engine with a redline of 8400 and a zero to 60 of 6 seconds. the average time passed for rpms to increase by 1 is 0.00037 seconds. this is the average so of course the maximums will be higher. 3rd, 4th and so on gears will be slower.

as for gas velocity, at ambient temperature of 20 C, exhaust temp of 700 C and pipe diameter of 50 mm, the velocity of the gases will be 98676 cm/sec @ 8000 rpms

using these numbers this is how the operation would go at 8k rpms wot:
time 0: combustion event
time 0.0010 s: exhaust gas makes it to the o2 sensor and afr reading occurs, computer is ready to make a correction for next revolution
time 0.0010 + 0.00037s: the engine makes correction, the rpms have increased by 2.668=8002.66rpms

looking at the numbers o2 fb should work at WOT

event if you are making crazy power and your rpms increase from 8000 to 8050(what i think is unlikely) it should still work.

empirically it has worked for me, but my engine is not yet fully tapped. i will see how it responds to o2 feedback when i am running 13.4 or higher at WOT.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #13  
wadzii's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 11
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

put a bump in your fuel map at WOT at 8000 rpms, turn on o2 fb and pull it in 1st gear.. it wont correct it.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #14  
timg's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 35
From: Decatur, GA
Default

Absolutely. It's easy to see a delay on logs between the fuel map and the O2 reading in lower gears or with fast acceleration. In higher gears or with slower ramp rates, the AFR and RPM tend to line up. The thing to remember is that it takes time for the O2 sensor to actually sense the change in the exhaust gasses. It does not react as quickly as the electronics it is connected with.

Tim
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 11:28 PM
  #15  
EK9MAX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Default

Can somebody post their target o2 feeback map so i can get an idea where i should be setting mine?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DiegoB16
S2000 Engine Management
19
Mar 31, 2017 10:29 AM
gacklez
S2000 Forced Induction
3
Aug 11, 2014 01:34 PM
indi00
S2000 Forced Induction
28
Mar 7, 2012 02:16 PM
S2BOOSTED
S2000 Forced Induction
1
Jan 2, 2011 05:02 PM
RedLineS2k10
S2000 Forced Induction
3
Sep 4, 2010 11:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 AM.