S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

AEM EMS 2STEP Settings

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 06:02 AM
  #41  
S2000Shifter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 5
From: Myrtle Beach
Default

Also in for settings...
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 06:53 AM
  #42  
Deception's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,036
Likes: 4
From: FAR BEYOND THE WHEEL...
Default

I will check my old turbo calibration & post up later for you guys.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 02:53 PM
  #43  
Deception's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,036
Likes: 4
From: FAR BEYOND THE WHEEL...
Default

heres the setting when car was running 12psi (410whp/280tq)
[attachment=7824:2step.JPG]
Attached Thumbnails AEM EMS 2STEP Settings-2step.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #44  
S2000Shifter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 5
From: Myrtle Beach
Default

I'm here to learn, so bare with me here. But if I'm SC, I get boost by RPM. Since all I'm trying to do is keep the RPMs consistant when launching, adding any retard (whatever causes flames) wouldn't be necessary. Wouldn't that make the 2Step safer to run on the motor?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #45  
package's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,073
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Are you on stock valvetrain? If so, i would advise against running the 2step unless you dont mind dropping a valve down the road. Just a warning.
Is there an issue for sc too?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 11:58 AM
  #46  
siadam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 1
From: Around
Default

Originally Posted by package
Originally Posted by Spoolin' timestamp='1254192103' post='17215900
Are you on stock valvetrain? If so, i would advise against running the 2step unless you dont mind dropping a valve down the road. Just a warning.
Is there an issue for sc too?
Doesn't matter what your power adder. Stock valves trains have been known to drop valves from cracking retainers/keepers. When you use a 2step, you are basically moving the combustion process from inside the cylinder where it belongs, to outside the cylinder, ie the exhaust ports/manifold/turbo, a delayed combustion if you will, it's hard on those parts as they weren't designed for it as you can imagine.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 12:12 PM
  #47  
package's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,073
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by siadam
Originally Posted by package' timestamp='1314039278' post='20902243
[quote name='Spoolin' timestamp='1254192103' post='17215900']
Are you on stock valvetrain? If so, i would advise against running the 2step unless you dont mind dropping a valve down the road. Just a warning.
Is there an issue for sc too?
Doesn't matter what your power adder. Stock valves trains have been known to drop valves from cracking retainers/keepers. When you use a 2step, you are basically moving the combustion process from inside the cylinder where it belongs, to outside the cylinder, ie the exhaust ports/manifold/turbo, a delayed combustion if you will, it's hard on those parts as they weren't designed for it as you can imagine.
[/quote]

What about the rev limiter? Is there also a problem with F/I?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 08:37 PM
  #48  
siadam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,791
Likes: 1
From: Around
Default

Originally Posted by package
Originally Posted by siadam' timestamp='1314043113' post='20902460
[quote name='package' timestamp='1314039278' post='20902243']
[quote name='Spoolin' timestamp='1254192103' post='17215900']
Are you on stock valvetrain? If so, i would advise against running the 2step unless you dont mind dropping a valve down the road. Just a warning.
Is there an issue for sc too?
Doesn't matter what your power adder. Stock valves trains have been known to drop valves from cracking retainers/keepers. When you use a 2step, you are basically moving the combustion process from inside the cylinder where it belongs, to outside the cylinder, ie the exhaust ports/manifold/turbo, a delayed combustion if you will, it's hard on those parts as they weren't designed for it as you can imagine.
[/quote]

What about the rev limiter? Is there also a problem with F/I?
[/quote]
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 05:01 AM
  #49  
package's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,073
Likes: 0
Default

I mean the redline rev limiter
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 05:20 AM
  #50  
DBXFX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 719
Likes: 1
Default

I think what he's wondering, is if it is bad to make a "2-step" limiter in the same way that a stock limiter works. I believe you would set it up as mentioned but just leave out the Ignition Retard setting and set the fuel cut first. That way, it will hold your revs for an easy launch, but not retard the timing causing heat buildup in the exhaust or a broken valvetrain. This would make more sense for a supercharger anyways because there is no need to try and spool it up via exhaust lol.

So I think your settings for a limiter without retard would be:

Soft - - - - Hard = 5 or lower. (This just changes how much RPMs will drop before the next fire I believe)
always on = Means it will always work providing you are under the set MPH
7000 ignition cut
6000 fuel cut = The ecu will cut fuel to the engine before spark, so there will not be excess fuel that gets burnt in the exhaust
??? ignition retard = I'm guessing either 0 or a value above 7000
MPH = Your choice. I prefer 5 or below

Please note, this WILL NOT build boost on any type of car. This is just a means of having the computer hold the revs for you for a consistent launch. Also, keep in mind that NO limiter is GOOD for your car. A fuel cut is much less likely to do valvetrain damage than an IGN/ Retard setup, however.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 AM.